Hey all--I'm sorry it's taken me so long to respond to this thread.
I'm a little short on bandwidth right now, and that's likely going to
get worse for at least a couple of weeks.
First of all, I think this discussion should include DAP [+CC]. DAP
folks, this discussion started at
http://lists.w3
On 6/3/10 4:13 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On Jun 2, 2010, at 23:02 , Jonas Sicking wrote:
I don't know who makes these decisions, but I'd imagine the editor
holds a certain amount of sway.
Decisions of what is in scope for a WG are made by the members (i.e. you) when
a WG is created. Wh
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2010, at 19:29 , Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote:
> > Actually, I should take that back. Some of the device specs are
> definitely relevant
>
> Right, and some of your colleagues just submitted Powerbox there, which
> seems like a non-neg
On Jun 3, 2010, at 19:29 , Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote:
> Actually, I should take that back. Some of the device specs are definitely
> relevant
Right, and some of your colleagues just submitted Powerbox there, which seems
like a non-negligible chunk of work to me ;-)
> though I have concerns abo
