JS crypto pointer

2010-06-09 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi, since some people were asking about JS crypto here not long ago, I thought I'd point this one out: http://bitwiseshiftleft.github.com/sjcl/ -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/

Re: JS crypto pointer

2010-06-09 Thread Nathan
Robin Berjon wrote: Hi, since some people were asking about JS crypto here not long ago, I thought I'd point this one out: http://bitwiseshiftleft.github.com/sjcl/ Thanks Robin! will come in handy :)

OFF TOPIC: SVG Progress Contest

2010-06-09 Thread Doug Schepers
Hey, folks- Sorry to spam this list, but I thought that folks who are familiar with the new progress events might be interested in applying those skills to SVG. This is a fun contest with some great prizes for making an SVG progress indicator. The contest ends in a couple days, so don't

RfC: LCWD of API and Ontology for Media Resource 1.0; deadline 11 July 2010

2010-06-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
All - the Media Annotations WG asked WebApps to review two of their LCWDs. Details below including the mail list for comments (deadline for comments is July 11). -Art Barstow Original Message Subject: Last Call Working Drafts transition announcement of the API and Ontology

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: I'm not sure I like the idea of offering sync cursors either since the UA will either need to load everything into memory before starting or risk

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: I'm not sure I like the idea of offering sync cursors either since the UA

RE: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti
Inline... -Original Message- From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:55 PM To: Jeremy Orlow Cc: Shawn Wilsher; Webapps WG Subject: Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes On Wed, Jun 9,

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti laxmi.oruga...@microsoft.com wrote: Inline... -Original Message- From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:55 PM To: Jeremy

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: I'm well aware of this. My argument is that I think we'll see people write code like this: results = []; db.objectStore(foo).openCursor(range).onsuccess = function(e) {  var cursor = e.result;  if (!cursor) {    

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Kris Zyp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/9/2010 4:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti laxmi.oruga...@microsoft.com wrote: Inline... -Original Message- From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org

IETF BoF @IETF-78 Maastricht: HASMAT - HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport

2010-06-09 Thread =JeffH
Hi, We will be hosting the HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport (HASMAT) Birds-of-a-Feather (BoF) session at IETF-78 in Maastricht NL during the week of July 25-30, 2010 (see [0] for mailing list). The purpose of IETF BoFs is to determine whether there is a problem

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Shawn Wilsher
On 6/9/2010 3:48 PM, Kris Zyp wrote: Another option would be to have cursors essentially implement a JS array-like API: db.objectStore(foo).openCursor(range).forEach(function(object){ // do something with each object }).onsuccess = function(){ // all done }); (Or perhaps the cursor with

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: I'm well aware of this. My argument is that I think we'll see people write code like this: results = [];

Re: [IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes

2010-06-09 Thread Shawn Wilsher
On 6/9/2010 3:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: At the very least, explicitly loading things into an honest-to-god array can make it more obvious that you're eating memory in the form of a big array, as opposed to just a magically transform my blob of data into something more convenient. I'm sorry,