Why not just use the unicode collation algorithm?
Then you won't have to hint the locale.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_collation_algorithm
CouchDB uses some definitions around sorting complex types like arrays and
objects but when it comes down to sorting strings it just defaults to to
From: Mikeal Rogers [mailto:mikeal.rog...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 11:35 PM
Why not just use the unicode collation algorithm?
Then you won't have to hint the locale.
Unless I'm missing something, the UCA defines the general algorithm for
collating strings but you
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.comwrote:
From: Mikeal Rogers [mailto:mikeal.rog...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 11:35 PM
Why not just use the unicode collation algorithm?
Then you won't have to hint the locale.
Unless I'm missing
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
We had some discussions about collation algorithms and such in the past, but
I don't think we have settled on the language aspect of it. In order to have
stores and indexes sort character-based keys in a way that
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
We had some discussions about collation algorithms and such in the past,
but I don't think we have settled on the language aspect of it. In
I don't feel strongly.
I'll file a bug for our proposed solution.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
On
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10349
Summary: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.description should be removed
from the spec and made optional
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10349
One quesiton though: if they pass in null or undefined, do we want to
interpret this as the argument not being passed in or simply let them
convert to undefined and null (which is the default behavior in WebIDL,
I believe). I feel somewhat
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10349
One quesiton though: if they pass in null or undefined, do we want to
interpret this as the argument not being passed in or simply let them
convert to undefined and null
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10349
One quesiton though: if they pass in null or undefined, do we want to
interpret this as the
Hi !
a)
If a XHR follows a redirection chain, does the API provide a way to
retrieve the final url?
b)
Could there be a way to opt-in into not following redirection chains ?
For instance, a redirectCount property, default value would be
something like Infinity (the user agent could then cap the
Below are the draft minutes from the August 12 Widgets voice conference
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before August 26 (the next Widgets
voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered Approved.
-Art
Is anyone attending Web science: A new frontier at the Royal Society?
http://royalsociety.org/Web-science-a-new-frontier
cheers
Jonathan
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 3:59 AM
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 3:59 AM
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 3:59
That sounds great to me.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
Given that open() is one of those functions that are likely to grow in
parameters over time, I wonder if we should consider taking an object as
We currently have two read-only transaction modes, READ_ONLY and SNAPSHOT_READ.
As we map this out to implementation we ran into various questions that made me
wonder whether we have the right set of modes.
It seems that READ_ONLY and SNAPSHOT_READ are identical in every aspect
(point-in-time
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.comwrote:
We currently have two read-only transaction modes, READ_ONLY and
SNAPSHOT_READ. As we map this out to implementation we ran into various
questions that made me wonder whether we have the right set of modes.
It
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
We currently have two read-only transaction modes, READ_ONLY and
SNAPSHOT_READ. As we map this out to implementation we ran into various
questions that made me wonder whether we have the right set of modes.
It seems that READ_ONLY and
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
We currently have two read-only transaction modes, READ_ONLY and
SNAPSHOT_READ. As we map this out to implementation we ran into various
questions that made me wonder
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:07:50 +0200, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi !
a)
If a XHR follows a redirection chain, does the API provide a way to
retrieve the final url?
Apart from document.responseXML.URL I do not think so. And I'm not sure if
document.responseXML.URL is supposed to
On , Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:07:50 +0200, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi !
a)
If a XHR follows a redirection chain, does the API provide a way to
retrieve the final url?
Apart from document.responseXML.URL I do not think so. And I'm not
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:07:50 +0200, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi !
a)
If a XHR follows a redirection chain, does the API provide a way to
retrieve the final url?
Apart from document.responseXML.URL I do
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10357
Summary: [IndexedDB] Remove the SNAPSHOT_READ transaction mode
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 2:18 AM
I think we should first break down the use cases and look at how many of
them just need _a_ sort order, how many of them a per-database sort order is
ok, and how many of them
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 3:36 AM
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
We had some
28 matches
Mail list logo
