On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:46:41 +0200, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you. But there is one thing missing: the final url in case of a
redirect chain. Currently that is not possible to guess for non xml
requests or HEAD requests. My use case was about doing a HEAD and
reading the
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:51:19 +0200, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
If instead, we had an API for auditing redirects (perhaps an onredirect
event), then we could let developers handle that event and call
preventDefault if they want to stop redirect processing. Otherwise, the
redirect
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.comwrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:51:19 +0200, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
If instead, we had an API for auditing redirects (perhaps an onredirect
event), then we could let developers handle that event and call
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:03:49 +0200, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Anne van Kesteren
ann...@opera.comwrote:
This does not work for synchronous requests in a worker.
Hmm, good point. An alternative design might be a flag that causes
.send() to
Below is the draft agenda for the September 2 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
On 01.09.2010 10:16, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
...
I thought of another reason to want the original XHR object to be
responsible for following the redirect: the value of a Location header
may be a relative URL. It would be nice if application authors did not
have to take care of resolving that
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10527
Summary: [IndexedDB] Result of IDBCursor.remove and update
unspecified.
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:03:49 +0200, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
This does not work for synchronous requests in a worker.
Hmm,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.dewrote:
On 01.09.2010 10:16, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
...
I thought of another reason to want the original XHR object to be
responsible for following the redirect: the value of a Location header
may be a relative URL. It
* Darin Fisher wrote:
Though note that relative URLs are forbidden in theory.
They are in RFC 2616, but not in HTTPbis ...
What does it mean for them to not be part of HTTPbis? Relative URLs in
Location headers are not uncommon.
You missed the double negative.
--
Björn Höhrmann ·
On 02.09.2010 00:00, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
mailto:julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 01.09.2010 10:16, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
...
I thought of another reason to want the original XHR object
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:32 AM
The WebApps WG will meet face-to-face November 1-2 as part of the W3C's
2010 TPAC meeting week [TPAC].
I created a stub
I'm hoping to be there yes. Especially if we'll get a critical mass of
IndexedDB contributors.
/ Jonas
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
I might attend if there are enough IndexedDB people there.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I'm hoping to be there yes. Especially if we'll get a critical mass of
IndexedDB contributors.
/ Jonas
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Pablo Castro
14 matches
Mail list logo
