Anne,
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:43:00 +0100, Arun Ranganathan
> wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Per http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#abort invoking abort()
> >> always
> >> results in events getting dispatched. This is not what happens in
> >> e.g.
> >> Gecko at the moment. When
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> On 12/6/2010 1:08 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> > > Since Hixie is active on HTML, perhaps someone else is willing to pick
> > > one of these LCs and to review the issues, bugs, diffs, etc. and propose
> > > the
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> Since Hixie is active on HTML, perhaps someone else is willing to pick
> one of these LCs and to review the issues, bugs, diffs, etc. and propose
> the next step . Any volunteers?
I am responding to feedback on these specs, just not on the schedule
That's what I thought when I first looked at it, however you can pre-set the
array length and then iterate over every byte and set it. It is not ideal,
but works. I have it running on http://appmator.appspot.com/ but it
basically boils down to the following:
var ui8a = new Uint8Array(output.lengt
I do not think UInt8Array has any data. It is just a view for
accessing the buffer.
--Toni
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Paul Kinlan wrote:
> I might have missed something but for appending client-side generated
> data to a blob can't you just append a UInt8Array as that is based off
> Array
Should the spec have notes referring to the fact that it requires ECMA5
conformance or parse errors may result?
I'm bringing this up regarding backward compatibility, as reserved
words, if not escaped, lead to parse errors.
Somewhat useful table:
http://kangax.github.com/es5-compat-table/
It
Re event-source spec, a few weeks ago I: reviewed the Bug list, reviewed
e-mails submitted to public-webapps re the Dec 2009 LC and compared the
LC version with the latest ED. I did not review WHATWG Issues for this
spec [Issues] because I didn't know it existed.
= Bugzilla: 4 bugs filed: 3 Fi
OK, so coming back to the what's next for these 3 LC documents question
[Head] ...
All of these specs have a Bugzilla component for issue and comment
tracking, all are included in the WHATWG issue tracker at [Issues], all
of the specs have changed since their LC was published and all of the
This should work fine in a nightly already, if it doesn't you need to file a
bug.
--Oliver
On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:08 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this was discussed and that EMCA5 does make it possible to
> use continue as we do. At least that's the conclusion we had with delete.
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:43:00 +0100, Arun Ranganathan
wrote:
- Original Message -
Per http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#abort invoking abort()
always
results in events getting dispatched. This is not what happens in e.g.
Gecko at the moment. When the state is EMPTY the method simpl
I'm pretty sure this was discussed and that EMCA5 does make it possible to
use continue as we do. At least that's the conclusion we had with delete.
My guess is that the JavaScriptCore (WebKit's main JavaScript engine)
parser needs to be changed. If so, you should probably file a bug at
webkit.o
11 matches
Mail list logo
