On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Richard Ishida ish...@w3.org wrote:
The example looks rather baroque, but I think it does illustrate a number
of points. (I think that in real life it may be simpler to just
Both Firefox and Chrome offer users privacy features which will cause Web
Storage to be non-persistent across browser restart. For example Firefox has a
Never remember history option, and Chrome has a clear cookies and other data
when I close my browser option.
For an application developer, it
(Note that this is from a ticket; the OP probably won't see replies here.)
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 7:46 PM, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com wrote:
When the user open a tab in private mode, he/she knows that data will not be
stored, therefore there is no need for the webpage to reiterate that.
FWIW, the Chrome team has come down pretty hard on the side of not ever
leaking to apps that the user is in incognito mode, for precisely the
reasons described previously. Incognito mode loses much of its utility if
pages are able to screen for it and block access.
I do think there's a user
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
FWIW, the Chrome team has come down pretty hard on the side of not ever
leaking to apps that the user is in incognito mode, for precisely the
reasons described previously. Incognito mode loses much of its utility if
pages
