On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 21:26, Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
> (Responding to multiple E-mails. Plead guilty to Ianesque behaviour there.
> Last draft of spec is http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/clipops/clipops.html.)
>
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:21:35 +0900, Paul Libbrecht
> wrote:
>
> - this seems to
What's the current thinking in terms of events that we're firing? I
remember we talked about this a bit, but I don't remember the conclusion and
I can't find it captured anywhere.
Here's a brain dump of the requirements as I remember them:
* Everything should have a source attribute.
* Everything
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> Dear Web Apps WG,
> Opera would like to provide some feedback based on our implementation
> experience of the Widgets Digsig specification.
>
> Generally, we found that the specification is implementable but have
> significant concerns about
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 03:56:31 +0100, Alex Milowski wrote:
>>
>> In reading through the current draft of XMLHttpRequest [1] I see a
>> consistent use of the term 'MIME type' instead of 'Media Type' as
>> defined by RFC 2046 [2]. RFC 2046
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 03:56:31 +0100, Alex Milowski
wrote:
In reading through the current draft of XMLHttpRequest [1] I see a
consistent use of the term 'MIME type' instead of 'Media Type' as
defined by RFC 2046 [2]. RFC 2046 does not define the term 'MIME
type' and only refers to 'MIME Media T
Dear Web Apps WG,
Opera would like to provide some feedback based on our implementation
experience of the Widgets Digsig specification.
Generally, we found that the specification is implementable but have
significant concerns about the requirement on XML Canonicalization 1.1.
Basically, we fo
