Hi Jonas
I have been trying out your suggestion of using a separate object store to do
manual indexing (and so support compound indexes or index object properties
with arrays as values).
There are some problems with this approach:
1. It's far too slow. To put an object and insert 50 index
On 3 March 2011 09:15, Joran Greef jo...@ronomon.com wrote:
Hi Jonas
I have been trying out your suggestion of using a separate object store to
do manual indexing (and so support compound indexes or index object
properties with arrays as values).
There are some problems with this approach:
Hi, Niwa-san.
On 2011/03/02 15:30, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Makoto Kato m_k...@ga2.so-net.ne.jp
mailto:m_k...@ga2.so-net.ne.jp wrote:
On Safari 5, even if textbox has IME composition string, text into
textbox can be replaced by DOM/script. But other
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Makoto Kato m_k...@ga2.so-net.ne.jp wrote:
Hi, Niwa-san.
On 2011/03/02 15:30, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
You must have tested Chrome improperly. We currently have a bug in
Chrome. To see the bug, open the attached test and type nihao with
Chinese IME on Windows
Hi All,
There is significant support for this CfC and in general, I tend to
favor PEPO (publish early, publish often).
However, in this case, the group already agreed D3E is feature complete
and it would be suboptimal (some have suggested harmful), for WebApps to
publish a spec that
Hi All - I just wanted to let people know that on February 28, Hixie and
I had a brief exchange about this in #webapps:
[[
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20110228
# [21:14] Hixie ArtB: i'm always going to answer yes whenever you
ask if anything is ready to go to LC, CR, REC, or
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 04:43:04 +0100, Shiki Okasaka
shiki.okas...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the reason behind this has been discussed around:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2010OctDec/0081.html
Actually what are the blocking issues why DOM Core does not state like,
Hi All,
WebApps' Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving spec was last updated
by Nikunj in January 2010. Since then, my attempt to determine the level
of interest in this spec via the tread below (archived at [1]) received
no real traction.
As such, this is a Call for Consensus to formally
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
Summary: We should add a method to compare two IndxedDB keys
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12229
Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12234
Summary: [IndexedDB] Integrate with the HTML5 event loop
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11978
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Following up on this older thread, Mozilla has added ArrayBuffer to
their XHR object, though the documentation
is a little bare.
xhr.mozResponseArrayBuffer
On 2/4/2011 2:01 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:56:13 +0100, Charles Pritchard
ch...@jumis.com wrote:
But in the
Hi.
It seems Mozilla extended the interface WorkerUtils in their implementation
with the atob/btoa functions.
I find them quite useful in that context, and would also encourage adding
escape, unescape, encodeURI, decodeURI, encodeURIComponent, decodeURIComponent
and many of the other global
15 matches
Mail list logo
