I like BDB's solution. You have one primary key you cannot mess with (say an
integer for fast comparisons) you can then add any number of secondary
indexes. With a secondary index there is a callback to generate a binary
blob that is used for indexing. The callback has access to all the fields of
See my proposal in another thread. The basic idea is to copy BDB. Have a
primary index that is based on an integer, something primitive and fast.
Allow secondary indexes which use a callback to generate a binary index key.
IDB shifts the complexity out into a library. Common use cases can be
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
Here's one ugliness with A: There's no way to specify ascending
or descending for the individual components of the key. So there's no
way
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Most SQL engines (Postgresql, SQLite) support CREATE INDEX idx ON tbl (date
DESC, name ASC) . This allows ORDER BY date DESC, name ASC (eg. newest
events first, events per date sorted by name) and its reverse, name DESC,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Keean Schupke ke...@fry-it.com wrote:
I like BDB's solution. You have one primary key you cannot mess with (say
an integer for fast comparisons) you can then add any number of secondary
indexes. With a secondary index there is a callback to generate a binary
From: keean.schu...@googlemail.com [mailto:keean.schu...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Keean Schupke
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:53 AM
See my proposal in another thread. The basic idea is to copy BDB. Have a
primary index that is based on an integer, something primitive and fast.
Allow
On Mar 15, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
I think it would be nice to unify the classes somehow. But that might be
difficult since SVG and CSS are (necessarily) separate specs. But maybe one
of the API gurus
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: keean.schu...@googlemail.com [mailto:keean.schu...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Keean Schupke
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:53 AM
See my proposal in another thread. The basic idea is to copy BDB. Have a
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:57 PM
However there is another problem to consider here. Can switching
collation on a objectStore or a unique index can affect its validity?
I.e. if you switch from a case sensitive to a case insensitive
On 18 March 2011 19:29, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: keean.schu...@googlemail.com [mailto:keean.schu...@googlemail.com]
On Behalf Of Keean Schupke
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:53 AM
See my proposal in another thread. The basic idea is to copy BDB. Have a
primary
10 matches
Mail list logo
