Hi Arun, Jonas - what is the status/plan for the File API spec?
What remains to be done before the spec is LC ready?
(Tracker shows 0 bugs and WebApps does not have a Bugzilla component for
this spec).
-Thanks, AB
On 4/11/11 9:38 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Arun, Jonas - what is the status/plan for the File API spec?
What remains to be done before the spec is LC ready?
Art:
A few things need to be done:
1. There continue to be a few spec. nits about multiple read calls;
these have to be addressed.
On 3/31/11 6:12 PM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Adrian Batemanadria...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 10:19 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 3/30/11 2:01 PM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Adrian Batemanadria...@microsoft.com
On Monday, April 11, 2011 8:28 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 3/31/11 6:12 PM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
I think it's cleaner and simpler just to throw. FileReader and XHR
are already different enough that a bit more, as long as it's a
usability improvement, isn't a big deal. The efficiency
On Apr/11/2011 11:20 AM, ext Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 4/11/11 9:38 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Arun, Jonas - what is the status/plan for the File API spec?
What remains to be done before the spec is LC ready?
Art:
A few things need to be done:
1. There continue to be a few spec. nits
On 4/11/11 12:05 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2011 8:28 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 3/31/11 6:12 PM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
I think it's cleaner and simpler just to throw. FileReader and XHR
are already different enough that a bit more, as long as it's a
usability
2011/4/7 Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
2011/4/7 louis-rémi BABE lrb...@gmail.com
Thank you all for your valuable answers.
There seems to be a pretty solid agreement on ability to exclude the
master page form the cache.
Michael, you are suggesting using a different way of referring
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote:
In general, I'm averse to throwing, since I think it puts an additional
burden on the developer (to catch, for example).
Only if the developer is trying to catch all exceptions, which you usually
don't. Most
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Monday, April 11, 2011 8:28 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
On 3/31/11 6:12 PM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
I think it's cleaner and simpler just to throw. FileReader and XHR
are already different enough that a bit more,
On 4/11/11 1:04 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com
mailto:a...@mozilla.com wrote:
In general, I'm averse to throwing, since I think it puts an
additional burden on the developer (to catch, for example).
Only if the developer
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote:
On the main thread, with your proposal, all reads will stop since an
exception has been raised.
That's odd--why would that happen? Normally one expects an API call that
throws an exception to have no effect. It'd
On Monday, April 11, 2011 10:23 AM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote:
In general, I'm averse to throwing, since I think it puts an additional
burden on the developer (to catch, for example).
I don't think so. I think that calling
File objects should have a readOnly property, indicating whether write
permission is granted by the user. Files returned from input elements
should, by default, set it. Constructing a FileWriter using a File with its
readOnly property set should throw an exception.
Later, it would be good to
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
File objects should have a readOnly property, indicating whether write
permission is granted by the user. Files returned from input elements
should, by default, set it. Constructing a FileWriter using a File with its
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote:
Are you thinking of FileEntry? File objects are always immutable, and
there's currently no way to get from a File to a FileWriter.
I'm thinking of File, but I didn't notice that there's no FileWriter(File)
constructor.
I
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote:
createWriter method to the objects in the HTMLInputElement.files array
(a new subclass of File), to create a writer for the underlying file.
That would violate the user expectation that files provided using a file
upload control on a form can't be
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
createWriter method to the objects in the HTMLInputElement.files array
(a new subclass of File), to create a writer for the underlying file.
That would violate the user expectation that files provided using a file
upload
On 4/11/2011 2:32 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote:
createWriter method to the objects in the HTMLInputElement.files array
(a new subclass of File), to create a writer for the underlying file.
That would violate the user expectation that files provided using a
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 4:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
The Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to publish a new
Working Draft of their spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do so:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
If one agrees with this
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:30, Charles McCathieNevile cha...@opera.comwrote:
comments on a couple of timeless' comments.
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:20:35 +0200, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
Calling clearData() empties the system clipboard, or removes the specified
type of data from the
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10622
Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10623
Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
22 matches
Mail list logo
