Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?

2011-04-27 Thread Rich Tibbett
Arthur Barstow wrote: Thanks for the update Richard. Is this spec ready for LCWD publication? If not, what remains to be done before it is LC-ready? Opera is happy for this specification to proceed to LCWD. I believe Marcos wanted to take a pass over the spec so I'll leave him to inform the

Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?

2011-04-27 Thread Scott Wilson
On 26 Apr 2011, at 16:59, Rich Tibbett wrote: Hi Scott, On 28.03.2011 at 15:59, Scott Wilson wrote: Are there any tests available - even informal ones - for the Widget Updates[1] spec? We've just uploaded the Widget Updates test suite to the CVS repository. The Widgets Updates

Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?

2011-04-27 Thread Scott Wilson
Right, I've done some basic work on the tests in Apache Wookie - most of them seem to work OK so far; I need to do interactive testing next - I've tested processing the update element in config.xml and acquiring and validating the UDD, but not actually processing the updates. However there are

Re: Model-driven Views

2011-04-27 Thread Olli Pettay
HI Rafael, few random comments, or mainly just random questions :) On 04/23/2011 03:35 AM, Rafael Weinstein wrote: Myself and a few other chromium folks have been working on a design for a formalized separation between View and Model in the browser, with needs of web applications being the

Call for Test Suite Contributions (WebApps testing process now considered operational)

2011-04-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
All - based on the last round of comments, I made some updates to the testing Approval document. I think we should now consider this process operational and of course it can be updated if/when it needs changes. Please consider this a call for test contributions:

Re: Model-driven Views

2011-04-27 Thread Erik Arvidsson
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:33, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote: Not sure why this had some relation with XBL. Unless you are planning to put the template based DOM nodes to anonymous DOM. The relation to XBL is that XBL has a template element and inside it you can bind attributes and

Re: Model-driven Views

2011-04-27 Thread Olli Pettay
On 04/27/2011 09:13 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:33, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote: Not sure why this had some relation with XBL. Unless you are planning to put the template based DOM nodes to anonymous DOM. The relation to XBL is that XBL has a template

Re: Model-driven Views

2011-04-27 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote: On 04/27/2011 09:13 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: 1. We wanttemplate  to be able to contain arbitrary content that is used as the content of the instances that are created from it. Now assume that the template element

Re: Model-driven Views

2011-04-27 Thread Rafael Weinstein
Hi Olli, Thanks very much for taking time to read digest our design. I'm going to use this thread to start a FAQ on our project site. Some of these questions have answers that deserve more detail than is wise to put in an email =-). On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Olli Pettay