http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12965
> Summary: Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5
> app, but the networking functions available are too
> restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not
> just
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12965
Summary: Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5
app, but the networking functions available are too
restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not
just for
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
> > IDBFactory.deleteDatabase can be called without ever invoking the
> > IDBDatabase.setVersion and requires a VERSION_CHANGE transaction for
> > it to happen. Unfortunately, ther
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> IDBFactory.deleteDatabase can be called without ever invoking the
> IDBDatabase.setVersion and requires a VERSION_CHANGE transaction for it to
> happen. Unfortunately, there is no way for the caller of deleteDatabase to
> receive a blocked
IDBFactory.deleteDatabase can be called without ever invoking the
IDBDatabase.setVersion and requires a VERSION_CHANGE transaction for it to
happen. Unfortunately, there is no way for the caller of deleteDatabase to
receive a blocked event because IDBRequest doesn't define an onblocked event
h
On 6/15/11 4:08 PM, David Bruant wrote:
2) XHR in the web browser gives (at the moment, at least) sites that are
outside a firewall that your browser is behind the ability to make requests to
hosts that are behind the firewall.
You wrote "at the moment, at least". Is there some planned chan
Le 15/06/2011 19:39, Adam Barth a écrit :
> The server still needs to opt-in to allowing the web site to read the
> response or you get into trouble with firewalls. This functionality
> is already available in every modern browser.
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Charles Pritchard
On June 16, the Device API group will publish a Last Call Working Draft
of its Calendar API spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-contacts-api-20110616/
Individuals are encouraged to provide individual feedback directly to
DAP via their public list:
public-device-a...@w3.org
If anyone
The server still needs to opt-in to allowing the web site to read the
response or you get into trouble with firewalls. This functionality
is already available in every modern browser.
Adam
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> There have been a few requests for an XHR wh
There have been a few requests for an XHR which does not expose session data to
the target. I believe IE9 has an interface for this; I know it's been requested
on chromium bug list.
On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 6/15/11 6:43 AM, David Bruant wrote:
>> Could someone e
On 6/15/11 6:43 AM, David Bruant wrote:
Could someone explain how running in a web browser justify such a
difference? For instance, could someone explain a threat particular to
cross-origin XHR in web browser?
Off the top of my head:
1) XHR in the web browser sends the user's cookies, HTTP au
Ian, I wish I knew that earlier when I originally posted the idea,
there was lots of discussion and good ideas but then it suddenly
dropped of the face of the earth. Essentially I am fowarding this
suggestion to public-webapps@w3.org on the basis as apparently most
discussion of File API specs happ
Hi,
I've been thinking a lot about same-origin policy recently. I understand
the protection it provides when it comes to cross-frame communication,
but I'm having a hard time understanding what it protects from when it
comes to cross-origin XHR.
Over the years, web sites have moved to web apps
13 matches
Mail list logo
