Re: A proposal for Element constructors

2011-10-27 Thread Kentaro Hara
Thanks for comments! Preface: Basically, I do not intend to propose Element constructors __instead__ of Element.create(button, ...) or new Element(button, ...) or some possible extension of .createElement(button, ...). I think that both are useful. In this thread, I would like to discuss whether

RfC: LCWD of Web Storage ; deadline November 15

2011-10-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
On October 25 a LCWD of Web Storage was published: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20111025/ Please send all comments to public-webapps@w3.org by November 15.

RfC: LCWD of Touch Events version 1; deadline November 17

2011-10-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
On October 27, the Web Events WG published a LCWD of the Touch Events version 1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-Touch-Events-20111027/ That WG explicitly asked the WebApps WG for comments. Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback directly to the Web Events WG

Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?

2011-10-27 Thread ATSUSHI TAKAYAMA
Hi Jonas and all, So converting Blob to ArrayBuffer is only supported through an asynchronous API (FileReader's readAsArrayBuffer) except in Workers, but the other way round is synchronous? I thought the direction of the client side web was to make all API's that might involve disk access

RE: [indexeddb] DOM Level 4 Exceptions and Error updates to IDB spec

2011-10-27 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:23 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: Based on the feedback from Jonas, Cameron, and Anne, we updated the exception and error model in the IndexedDB spec [1].  Now, we match the DOM Level 4

Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?

2011-10-27 Thread ATSUSHI TAKAYAMA
I see. Thanks Glenn. A. TAKAYAMA On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:51 AM, ATSUSHI TAKAYAMA taka.atsu...@googlemail.com wrote: So converting Blob to ArrayBuffer is only supported through an asynchronous API (FileReader's

Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?

2011-10-27 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:14:39 +0900, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: b = new Blob([foo, bar], { contentType: text/plain }); isn't too bad. The other properties that I could think of that we'd want to add sometime

[Bug 14331] EventSource can end up in the wrong state due to race conditions (see comment 12 paragraph 2)

2011-10-27 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14331 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?

2011-10-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:12:31 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: The prime use of this value is actually to act like a content type header when a URL created through createObjectURL(blob) is loaded. Doesn't it set Blob.type? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/

Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?

2011-10-27 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:12:31 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: The prime use of this value is actually to act like a content type header when a URL created through createObjectURL(blob) is loaded. Doesn't

[Bug 14578] New: Figure out how to behave if editing host is an inline element

2011-10-27 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14578 Summary: Figure out how to behave if editing host is an inline element Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW