Thanks for comments!
Preface: Basically, I do not intend to propose Element constructors
__instead__ of Element.create(button, ...) or new Element(button,
...) or some possible extension of .createElement(button, ...). I
think that both are useful. In this thread, I would like to discuss
whether
On October 25 a LCWD of Web Storage was published:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20111025/
Please send all comments to public-webapps@w3.org by November 15.
On October 27, the Web Events WG published a LCWD of the Touch Events
version 1 spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-Touch-Events-20111027/
That WG explicitly asked the WebApps WG for comments.
Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback
directly to the Web Events WG
Hi Jonas and all,
So converting Blob to ArrayBuffer is only supported through an
asynchronous API (FileReader's readAsArrayBuffer) except in Workers,
but the other way round is synchronous? I thought the direction of the
client side web was to make all API's that might involve disk access
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:23 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Based on the feedback from Jonas, Cameron, and Anne, we updated the
exception and error model in the IndexedDB spec [1]. Now, we match the
DOM Level 4
I see. Thanks Glenn.
A. TAKAYAMA
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:51 AM, ATSUSHI TAKAYAMA
taka.atsu...@googlemail.com wrote:
So converting Blob to ArrayBuffer is only supported through an
asynchronous API (FileReader's
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:14:39 +0900, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
b = new Blob([foo, bar], { contentType: text/plain });
isn't too bad. The other properties that I could think of that we'd
want to add sometime
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14331
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:12:31 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
The prime use of this value is actually to act like a content type header
when a URL created through createObjectURL(blob) is loaded.
Doesn't it set Blob.type?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:12:31 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
The prime use of this value is actually to act like a content type header
when a URL created through createObjectURL(blob) is loaded.
Doesn't
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14578
Summary: Figure out how to behave if editing host is an inline
element
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
11 matches
Mail list logo