It would be really nice if we could move forward with this thread.
My preference is still to not do any HTML/XML specific processing when
.responseType is set to anything other than or document. This
allows us to make encoding handling consistent for text and a
possible future incremental text
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
It would be really nice if we could move forward with this thread.
I was planning on reporting back when I have something that passes all
mochitests. This has been delayed by other stuff. Particularly fallout
from the new View
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
Also, the current spec leads to quite strange results if we end up
supporting more text-based formats directly in XHR. For example in
Gecko we've added experimental support for parsing into JSON. If we
added this to a future
On Sunday, November 06, 2011 4:14 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Thursday, October 27, 2011 6:00 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at
Here's one post-TPAC riff. Take it or leave it.
One theme that was easy to observe at the conference was the pondering
around who those mysterious consumers of what we do are, how to reach
them, and how to reason about them. I heard people speak of Web
Authors and Web Developers and making
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Would you be able to post the code from the blog post comment example?
Here it is what you saw, with some irrelevant parts removed. Just to set
expectations: this was already two months old, so it lags our current
thinking
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14712
Summary: Clarify copyright situation of Selection text
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
All,
At this I've lost track of what the current proposals are on tag names
in the component model. I've been thinking about this a bit, and I
would like us to look at a particular use case: subclassing img and
adding some behavior to it.
An obvious question: Should the localName/tagName
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't really follow. Script won't execute until you append the fragment
to the DOM, at which point the fragment itself doesn't go in the DOM, just
it's children. So, I'm not really sure what sandboxing on fragments would
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Ryan Seddon seddon.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't really follow. Script won't execute until you append the fragment
to the DOM, at which point the fragment itself doesn't go in the DOM, just
10 matches
Mail list logo
