As agreed at the Last F2F, *new* work items for Widgets will be undertaken in
the Native Web Apps CG.
Existing Widgets deliverables for Widgets (Updates, API, and URI) will become
joint deliverables where necessary with this WG.
To participate in Widget work, please join:
Yes, if you configure your browser to do so, you'll be assaulted with requests
for a test db from many Web sites that use common frameworks.
I don't think that this should count as use.
I do think now is precisely the time to be asking this kind of question; these
features are NOT yet used at
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
Yes, if you configure your browser to do so, you'll be assaulted with
requests for a test db from many Web sites that use common frameworks.
I don't think that this should count as use.
Indeed. That is not the sort of use
On 21/11/2011, at 10:42 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
You're welcome to tilt at that windmill, but the chance that you get
these APIs removed from browser is approximately zero.
There's a difference between the W3C and browser vendors promoting these as the
future of the Web as-is, and supporting
The idea is not to remove APIs.
We have several client-side storage facilities that cover different but
overlapping
usecases. Can we step back and look at what we have and come up, perhaps, with
a
smaller set of facilities and better coordinated APIs.
All the best, Ashok
On 11/20/2011 3:42
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:30:15 -0500, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
Yes, if you configure your browser to do so, you'll be assaulted with
requests for a test db from many Web sites that use common frameworks.
I don't think that this should count as use.
I do think now is precisely the
On 11/20/11 7:27 PM, Mike Taylor wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:30:15 -0500, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net
wrote:
Yes, if you configure your browser to do so, you'll be assaulted with
requests for a test db from many Web sites that use common frameworks.
I don't think that this should count
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Mike Taylor mi...@opera.com wrote:
A quick search of Google code [1], Github [2][3], and Bitbucket [4][5] would
indicate otherwise, IMO. For example, the TinyMCE WYSIWYG editor that is
included in every Wordpress installation (currently estimated at 65,787,814
