I'm looking at http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/streamsapi/,
and specifically at the StreamBuilder.
It has the possibility to generate an event if the data available falls
below a threshold. How is this supposed to work if there is more than
one consumer, and those consumers either
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15595
Summary: The abstract could be improved by pointing out that
WebSocket protocol is defined by the IETF, while
this API specifies the browser API to use that
protocol. The
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
We could define it in terms of defaultView (or browsing context) and put our
effort into getting interoperability on defaultView?
This is what I've done for now:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/editing/rev/4dc4d65cc87e
At least
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/13/12 2:37 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
HTML uses this concept in lots of places, e.g.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#cookie-free-document-object
A Document that has no browsing context.
Ah, that's better than using
On 1/17/12 4:55 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/13/12 2:37 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
HTML uses this concept in lots of places, e.g.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#cookie-free-document-object
A Document that has no browsing context.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/17/12 4:55 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 1/13/12 2:37 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
HTML uses this concept in lots of places, e.g.
We agree this should be added to the WebApps WG charter (with the details of
exactly what to do worked out as part of the WG effort).
This should be done somewhere in W3C, and the Web Apps WG seems a the best
place due to the very wide participation here.
We're looking forward to working on
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
Sorry for restarting this thread, but it seems we did not reach any
conclusions last time around.
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:07:48 +0100, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
I think I may have missed something important. XHR2
