Hello,
See PeerConnection in http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html
Ah, I was looking in the wrong place then :)
Is this considered as part of the HTML5 specification?
Thanks,
-Rick
no
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Rick van Rein r...@openfortress.nl wrote:
Hello,
See PeerConnection in http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html
Ah, I was looking in the wrong place then :)
Is this considered as part of the HTML5 specification?
I’m concerned that people will listen to IDBRequest’s “success” event
to notify when an add or put has been successfully written. For
example, the “Using IndexedDB” article[1] recommends, “The first thing
you'll want to do with almost all of the requests you generate is to
add success and error
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 10:58, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Cameron has addressed the comments from Web IDL LC#3 [1] and the bug
list only contains two enhancement requests [2]. As such, this is a call
for consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL using the
following ED
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:24:23 +0100, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 10:58, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Cameron has addressed the comments from Web IDL LC#3 [1] and the bug
list only contains two enhancement requests [2]. As such, this is a call
for consensus to
-Original Message-
From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:cha...@opera.com]
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:24:23 +0100, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 10:58, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Cameron has addressed the comments from Web IDL LC#3 [1] and the bug
list only
I second Bryan's request.
Having apps that need to monitor remote events each spawn a (shared)worker
to do so could drain a phone's battery very quickly.
There needs to be a system-level way to do this.
--tobie
On 3/12/12 11:47 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:
Karl, excellent
Hi, folks-
The Audio Working Group published an updated Working Draft of Web Audio
API [1] on 15 March 2012. From the introduction:
[[
This specification describes a high-level JavaScript API for processing
and synthesizing audio in web applications. The primary paradigm is of
an audio
That sounds good to me. Can you file a bug in our bugzilla?
Though note that the situation is a bit more complex. If a page
expects that a write can fail with a ConstraintError then the page
might want to listen to the error event and call preventDefault() on
it.
But yeah, I agree that listening
Hello, public-webapps!
Here's another summary of work, happening in Web Components.
SHADOW DOM (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=14978)
* First bits of the Shadow DOM test suite have landed:
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ShadowDOM/tests/submissions/Google/tests.html
* More
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16441
Summary: Spec should note that onsuccess shouldn’t be used for
writes.
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
That sounds good to me. Can you file a bug in our bugzilla?
Filed:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16441
On 2012-02-21 21:32, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Mark Baker wrote:
I wish they did, consistently. See RFC 4288 (just media type) and
the registry itself (MIME media type)
http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/index.html. Plus
they're still routinely referred to as MIME types in many IETF
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
One working subset would be:
* Keep createFileWriter async.
* Make it optionally exclusive
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
One working subset would be:
* Keep createFileWriter async.
* Make it optionally exclusive
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
One working subset would be:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Yonathan yonat...@gmail.com wrote:
Should the specification encourage onsuccess
for reads and oncomplete for writes?
I don't think any amount of documentation is going to stop this from being
confusing. Committing transactions should really have been an
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Yonathan yonat...@gmail.com wrote:
Should the specification encourage onsuccess
for reads and oncomplete for writes?
I don't think any amount of documentation is going to stop this from
Hi Ojam, all,
Thanks for the feedback. I have updated the proposed changes
(http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css3-regions/css-om) to use a static NodeList for
Nodes and sequenceT for Ranges and Regions.
Cheers,
-v
From: Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.orgmailto:o...@chromium.org
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012
Unrelated:
If an exception was propagated out from any event handler while
dispatching the event in step 3, abort the transaction by following the
steps for aborting a transaction using transaction as transaction
parameter, and AbortError as error.
Exceptions don't propagate out of event
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Unrelated:
If an exception was propagated out from any event handler while dispatching
the event in step 3, abort the transaction by following the steps for
aborting a transaction using transaction as transaction parameter,
21 matches
Mail list logo
