Re: [XHR] Constructor behavior seems to be underdefined

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 4/2/12 6:46 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote: >> >> Boris Zbarsky: >>> >>> And just to be clear, the discussion about security and document.domain >>> is somewhat orthogonal to the original issue. WebIDL requires that all >>> objects be associat

Workshop IHM

Appel à communications Chers Mesdames et Messieurs, C'est avec un grand plaisir que nous annonçons le premier appel à communications du Workshop: Interaction Homme-Machine Ce Workshop qui aura lieu du 16 au 18 juin 2012 à Sousse est organisé par L'unité de recherche : Sciences Et Technologie

RE: [Clipboard] Mathematical Proofs in HTML5 Documents‏

Henri Sivonen, While some mathematics, clipboarding and drag and drop topics have been previously discussed, some topics are still somewhat pioneer with regard to both math islands and math archipelagos. Browser support topics for mathematics-related functionalities are exciting

RE: Speech API Community Group

The problem is that the community group has an ambiguous “charter”, and at least some folks would like this clarified before joining. Being that Speech-XG and Webapps are the two most relevant lists, I don’t know where else the discussion would take place. I believe that all of this could be c

Re: Speech API Community Group

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Glen Shires wrote: > We at Google have proposed the formation of a new "Speech API Community > Group" to pursue a JavaScript Speech API. We encourage you to join and > support this effort. [1] > > We believe that forming a Community Group has the following advanta

Re: Speech API Community Group

I'd like to encourage everyone interested in the Speech API to join the mailing list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-speech-api/ For those interested in more hands-on interaction, there's the CG: http://www.w3.org/community/speech-api/ For some archived mailing list discussion, brow

RE: Speech API Community Group

A little bit of historical context and resource references might be helpful for some on the email thread. While this is still an early stage for a community group, if one will happen, it actually isn’t early for the community as a group to talk about this. In many ways we’ve already done the i

Re: Speech API Community Group

We can discuss this in terms of generalities without any resolution, so let me offer two more concrete use cases: > My friend Jóse is working on a personal site to track teams and player > statistics at the Brazil 2014 World Cup. He recognizes that the browser will > define a default language

Re: Speech API Community Group

Perhaps true for users of the applicaitons. But, Authors would need Resource-specification(location), hence clearly specifying how network/local services can be used ( even if protocols are out of scope) , outside of browser-defaults will be of interest to many including Openstream. Raj O

RE: Speech API Community Group

It matters to the application author that they can select a service that works best for them. Relying on browser or OS configurations would not suffice for real-world speech applications. I don't see how we can properly specify the process of selection without the mention of network services.

Re: Speech API Community Group

On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Young, Milan wrote: > The proposal mentions that the specification of a network speech protocol is > out of scope. This makes sense given that protocols are the domain of the > IETF. > > But I’d like to confirm that the use of network speech services are in scope

TransAnn: CORS published as Last Call Working Draft

The WebApps and WebAppSec WG would like to announce the publication of Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) as a Last Call Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/cors/ Please send comments about this document to public-webapp...@w3.org with [CORS] as the start of the subject line. Deadline for co

RE: Speech API Community Group

The proposal mentions that the specification of a network speech protocol is out of scope. This makes sense given that protocols are the domain of the IETF. But I'd like to confirm that the use of network speech services are in scope for this CG. Would you mind amending the proposal to make thi

Speech API Community Group

We at Google have proposed the formation of a new "Speech API Community Group" to pursue a JavaScript Speech API. We encourage you to join and support this effort. [1] We believe that forming a Community Group has the following advantages: - It’s quick, efficient and minimizes unnecessary process

Re: [Clipboard] Mathematical Proofs in HTML5 Documents‏

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Adam Sobieski wrote: > MathML3 includes and elements which can > provide parallel representations of mathematical semantics > 1. Having entire proofs in elements. Proof formats could then express > semantics in or elements. OpenMath content > dictionaries coul

FYI: Speech API Community Group Proposed

FYI: yesterday, a Speech API CG was proposed . Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: > From: ext Do Not Reply > Date: April 2, 2012 4:54:46 PM EDT > To: > Subject: Speech API Community Group Proposed > archived-at: