On 07/05/2012 08:00 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 07/05/2012 03:11 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
mailto:olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 07/05/2012 01:38
But anyhow, event based API is ok to me.
In general I prefer events/event listeners over other callbacks.
On 07/05/2012 11:37 AM, Olli Pettay wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:00 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 07/05/2012 03:11 AM,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.org
wrote:
while reading
http://www.w3.org/TR/quota-api/#quota-handling-in-storage-api
I wondered what the desired behavior was when the UA refuses to
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:00 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 07/05/2012 03:11 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
So, it is very much implementation detail.
(And I still
On 07/05/2012 05:15 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:00 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 07/05/2012 03:11 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
So, it is very
On 07/05/2012 12:38 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
Hi all,
Sukolsak has been implementing the Undo Manager API in WebKit but the fact
undoManager.transact() takes a pure JS object with callback functions is
making it very challenging. The problem is that this object needs to be
kept alive by either
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17702
Summary: [IndexedDB editorial] IDBIndex.getKey should tell what
it's doing
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Sorry for being unclear.
I would like to see the standard to include what happens when a page
requests quota using requestQuota, but the UA doesn't fulfill the request
because of some user configured policies (and not because it's just not
possible).
This would allow a web site to display
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:00 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 07/05/2012 03:11 AM,
On 07/05/2012 08:01 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com
mailto:w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
mailto:olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 07/05/2012 08:00 AM, Adam Barth
Btw, is there something unique with UndoManager which causes implementation
problems in WebKit?
There are plenty of other APIs not using eventlisteners which take JS
callbacks: setTimeout, requestAnimationFrame,
Google's File System API, PeerConnection ... Why aren't those causing problems?
We
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:08 AM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote:
On 07/05/2012 12:38 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
After this change, authors can write:
scope.undoManager.transact(new AutomaticDOMTransaction{**function () {
scope.appendChild(foo);
}, 'append foo'));
instead of:
On 07/05/2012 10:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
Also, I think consistency matters a lot here. I'm not aware of any other
Web-facing API that takes a pure object with callback functions.
Except of course event listeners. Well, addEventListener can take an object
with _a_ callback function.
I
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:08 AM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote:
On 07/05/2012 12:38 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
After this change, authors can write:
scope.undoManager.transact(new AutomaticDOMTransaction{function () {
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:08 AM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com **wrote:
On 07/05/2012 12:38 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
After this change, authors can write:
Passing in objects containing one or more non-callback properties is also
an increaingly common pattern, and we are trying to replace legacy APIs
that took lots of positional arguments with options-object based
replacements (e.g. init*Event). From the point of view of a javascript
author
Thanks for the feedback. We need more developer feedbacks on this spec.
On Jul 5, 2012 1:50 PM, Yuval Sadan sadan.yu...@gmail.com wrote:
Passing in objects containing one or more non-callback properties is
also an increaingly common pattern, and we are trying to replace legacy
APIs that took
To sum up, as an author I vote for--
var t = undoManager.transact(foo);
t.onundo = function() { ... };
OR t.setUndo(function() { });
How do you envision it should work with an automatic transaction?
We need some mechanism to tell the UA record DOM mutations while I'm
calling
On Jul 5, 2012 2:50 PM, Yuval Sadan sadan.yu...@gmail.com wrote:
To sum up, as an author I vote for--
var t = undoManager.transact(foo);
t.onundo = function() { ... };
OR t.setUndo(function() { });
How do you envision it should work with an automatic transaction?
We need some
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:08 AM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com **
wrote:
On 07/05/2012 12:38 AM,
t = undoManager.transact(foobar, function() { ... });
t.onredo = function() { /* custom redo */ };
t.execute();
Whether onundo/onredo are assigned upon execute() is well defined, so
basing behavior on that is clear enough for me. Plus, I wonder - what is a
non-automatic transaction
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:08 AM, James
22 matches
Mail list logo
