Florian Bösch , 2012-08-12 12:36 +0200:
> It's my understanding that if you want to define a strict parser using a
> DTD that describes the markup, it's impossible to introduce arbitrary tage
> names (as in there are not tag wildcards in a DTD). A document that used
> arbitrary tags could not be v
"Tab Atkins Jr." , 2012-08-12 15:43 -0700:
> What Dimitri said, but to address your comment directly, DTD-based
> validation is long-dead, at least when applied to HTML. A DTD can't
> capture the validity requirements that the HTML spec already imposes,
> so it's irrelevant if it also can't valid
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Florian Bösch wrote:
> It's my understanding that if you want to define a strict parser using a DTD
> that describes the markup, it's impossible to introduce arbitrary tage names
> (as in there are not tag wildcards in a DTD). A document that used arbitrary
> tags
I build de demo script (for firefox) here :
http://experiments.benvii.com/blob_content_length/
You will also notice that the player's load event isn't called.
Content-Length should be added to firefox (maybe open a ticket on
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/) but it should also be recommended in th
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Benjamin BERNARD
wrote:
> Hi,
> I was developing an offline music web App when I discover that is no
> "Content-length" header specified here :
> http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#ProtocolExamples
> So when you play an audio/video file stored as a blob (under a blob UR
Hi,
I was developing an offline music web App when I discover that is no
"Content-length" header specified here :
http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#ProtocolExamples
So when you play an audio/video file stored as a blob (under a blob URI)
it's considered by the player as streaming content which mean
On Aug 12, 2012 11:08 AM, "Dimitri Glazkov" wrote:
>
> Hi Dave!
>
> There's been a long, challenging, and yet inconclusive discussion
> around this. Start with these threads:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1156.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-we
Hi Dave!
There's been a long, challenging, and yet inconclusive discussion
around this. Start with these threads:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1156.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0419.html
:DG<
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:05 P
It's my understanding that if you want to define a strict parser using a
DTD that describes the markup, it's impossible to introduce arbitrary tage
names (as in there are not tag wildcards in a DTD). A document that used
arbitrary tags could not be validated.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Dave
Markup could be much cleaner if custom elements use the element name,
rather than the is attribute. instead of
10 matches
Mail list logo
