Re: [widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation

2012-09-28 Thread Charles McCathie Nevile
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:55:37 +0400, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote: On 9/27/12 9:35 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: W3C Advisory Committee members are asked to Please review the specification and indicate whether you endorse it as W3C Recommendation or object to its

Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

2012-09-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Boris Zbarsky: Should WebIDL change here? Should FileAPI change? Technically, it is not possible to implement File API without also implementing the URL specification, since if there is a partial interface URL then there must also be a interface URL in the set of IDL fragments that you

Re: [widgets] Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML Configuration (Second Edition) is a Proposed Edited Recommendation

2012-09-28 Thread Tobie Langel
On 9/28/12 10:18 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:55:37 +0400, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote: On 9/27/12 9:35 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: W3C Advisory Committee members are asked to Please review the specification and

[Bug 15718] Need to decide if URLs can ever fail to parse

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug 14210] Reflecting href with a URL that doesn't resolve doesn't return the empty string in browsers (at least opera/moz, don't know what URL would fail to resolve in webkit). Instead it returns

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14210 Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug 15684] [URL] Replacing backslash with forward slash in URIs doesn't seem to be necessitated by web compat

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15684 Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 17772] [URL] The definition of absolute url makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17772 Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10894] [pending URL spec] Reflecting an IDL attribute with a URL should try to canonicalize whatever value is set

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10894 Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 19114] New: (editorial) gopher missing quote

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19114 Summary: (editorial) gopher missing quote Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug 19114] (editorial) gopher missing quote

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19114 Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

2012-09-28 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 9/28/12 12:38 PM, Travis Leithead wrote: It seems more important to check for the features of the spec, rather than spec support in general. I would expect if (URL.createObjectURL) for example. You have it backwards. That's checking for the file API bits. How do you check whether you

[Bug 18189] The DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope interface must not exist ... s/interface/interface object/ ?

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18189 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 18221] the word 'using' is repeated in the last line following 'Shared Blacklists' (This information can then be shared with other sites, using using visitors' IP)

2012-09-28 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18221 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

2012-09-28 Thread Travis Leithead
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu] On 9/28/12 12:38 PM, Travis Leithead wrote: It seems more important to check for the features of the spec, rather than spec support in general. I would expect if (URL.createObjectURL) for example. You have it backwards. That's checking for

Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

2012-09-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Travis Leithead: I guess you'd check for URL.href then? Or try { new URL(/test); } catch (ex) { console.log(not supported); } I agree with Travis, you should be checking the particular features you want to use, rather than checking the existence of the prototype as a proxy for that test.

Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

2012-09-28 Thread Rick Waldron
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote: Travis Leithead: I guess you'd check for URL.href then? Or try { new URL(/test); } catch (ex) { console.log(not supported); } I agree with Travis, you should be checking the particular features you want to use,

RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?

2012-09-28 Thread Travis Leithead
I was alluding to this behavior for interface objects (e.g., URL): 4.4.1.1. Interface object [[Call]] method §http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#es-interface-call If the interfacehttp://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#dfn-interface is declared with a