On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Angelina Fabbro
wrote:
> I was having an exchange with a gentleman named Tom Ashworth that made it's
> way off list.
>
> What he had said to me in a previous message about @host:
>
> "@host { } is weird. As far as I can tell, nothing inside it will be applied
> unl
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Angelina Fabbro
wrote:
> Hello public-webapps,
Hi Angelina! I really enjoyed your video. It was great.
> 1. It looks like from the spec and the code in Glazkov's polyfill that if I
> add and remove the 'is' attribute, the shadow tree should apply/unapply
> itse
I was having an exchange with a gentleman named Tom Ashworth that made it's
way off list.
What he had said to me in a previous message about @host:
"@host { } is weird. As far as I can tell, nothing inside it will be
applied unless the matched element is the shadow host. The spec says 'must
only
On 11/13/12 6:23 PM, Angelina Fabbro wrote:
Good to know I can style the shadow DOM hosts this way.
The message you're replying to never made it to the list. Can you
re-post it for context?
thanks,
--
Mike Taylor
Opera Software
To answer Brian:
1. To recap:
- A developer can dynamically add and remove individual custom elements to
and from the parent document.
- A developer cannot dynamically apply or unapply the 'is' attribute to
have an element behave like a custom on the fly.
Is this correct?
Being able to take th
Brian Kardell :: @bkardell :: hitchjs.com
On Nov 13, 2012 9:34 AM, "Angelina Fabbro" wrote:
>
> Hello public-webapps,
>
> I'm Angelina, and I've been very interested in shadow DOM and web
components for some time now. So much so that I've tried to teach people
about them several times. There's a v
No problem! I'm just poking away at this trying to learn more. No rush by
any means.
Angelina here again -
Good to know I can style the shadow DOM hosts this way. Good for styling
elements that are specifically affected by the shadow DOM magic. I can see
that being important. So:
@host {
*[is="news"] {
backg
> Making offline apps easier?
Feels like we're still at the 'make it possible' phase more so than the
'make it easier' phase.
I think it's fitting that appcache and widgets were listed at opposite ends
in your list because the intent of the former is to make it possible for
"drive-by-web" sites
> 4. Databases
> IndexedDB seems to be getting traction across all platforms. Unlike at the
> face to face, when literally nobody spoke in favour of WebSQL, there are
> people who think it is worthwhile. At the same time Ashok has been hinting
> at using something more seriously SQL to help with is
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Kyaw Tun wrote:
> In contrast to IDBIndex, IDBObjectStore does not have openKeyCursor
> method. This method fetch list of keys of a given range without cost
> of serialization. There is no other ways to iterate keys only from
> IDBObjectStore. However efficient fe
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19955
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 19955
CC: m...@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
Assignee: dave.n...@w3.org
Summary: [IndexedDB] Add IDBObjectStore.openKeyCursor
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugz
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19955
Joshua Bell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
In contrast to IDBIndex, IDBObjectStore does not have openKeyCursor method.
This method fetch list of keys of a given range without cost
of serialization. There is no other ways to iterate keys only from
IDBObjectStore. However efficient fetching of keys in a specific range is
required in high perf
Hi all,
I've pushed an updated ED [1] in which we editors incorporated Anne's
changes (up to Sep) based upon the discussion in the F2F in Lyon. Here's the
list of changes:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr
Most notably,
- the constructor AnonXMLHttpRequest() has been removed and replaced by
using dictio
15 matches
Mail list logo
