date:20130228

Re: Streams and Blobs

2013-02-28 Thread Anne van Kesteren

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: Also, the Stream object lets you pipe the data from to/from Web Workers, which can be handy in certain scenarios. Hey Travis, could you maybe reply to my original or at least some of the earlier emails that

Re: Streams and Blobs

2013-02-28 Thread Anne van Kesteren

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote: I was confused when reading only: The arraybuffer response entity body is an ArrayBuffer representing the response entity body. and then: The response entity body is the fragment of the entity body

[admin] Towards XHR The Attorney's Edition

2013-02-28 Thread Arthur Barstow

Last year we agreed to stop work on the baseline XHR spec because no one was willing to work on that version of the spec. Since then, the new XHR Editors agreed to work on a baseline version as well as to continue to work on the `bleeding edge` version. One goal of the baseline version is to

Re: Streams and Blobs

2013-02-28 Thread Glenn Maynard

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: It's a fair question, and I think you've made a lot of good points. I think XHR gives you the ability to customize the HTTP request. You can set custom request headers, customize the request method, control cross-origin

Re: Streams and Blobs

2013-02-28 Thread Aaron Colwell

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote: I'm simply asking: what use cases there are for creating a stream with XHR and handing the stream off to another API, that can't be done much more simply by handing a URL to the other API in the first place? I've trimmed

[Bug 21147] WebSocket API could provide a method to get the HTTP response code when it's not 101

2013-02-28 Thread bugzilla

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21147 Art Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Request for Review: Test cases for Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2013-02-28 Thread Alex Kuang

We have submitted 30 test cases for Web Messaging CR [CR]. They are available here: http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebMessaging/tests/submissions/Microsoft/ Please consider this email our Request for Review [RfR] for the test cases listed below with a proposed deadline for comments of March 28,

Re: [admin] Towards XHR The Attorney's Edition

2013-02-28 Thread Charles McCathie Nevile

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:46:34 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Last year we agreed to stop work on the baseline XHR spec because no one was willing to work on that version of the spec. Since then, the new XHR Editors agreed to work on a baseline version as well as to