Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote: I've avoided weighing in on this thread until I had more IDB experience. I've been wrestling with it on two fronts of late: A re-interpretation of the API based on Futures:

Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alec Flett alecfl...@chromium.org wrote: My primary takeaway from both working on IDB and working with IDB for some demo apps is that IDB has just the right amount of complexity for really large, robust database use.. but for a welcome to noSQL in the browser it

[Bug 17681] [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions types should define order

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17681 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

Re: [IndexedDB] better way of deleting records

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Kyaw Tun kyaw...@yathit.com wrote: From developer point of view, IDBObjectStore.delete method cannot be used directly in most use case, since IDBObjectStore.delete returns undefined. IDBObjectStore.delete(random_key) always receives onsuccess event, but nothing

Re: [IndexedDB] Attributes with undefined vs. null

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Joshua Bell jsb...@chromium.org wrote: Various atttributes in IndexedDB signal no value with |undefined|: IDBKeyRange.lowerBound (if not set) IDBKeyRange.upperBound (if not set) IDBRequest.result (on error, or on successful deleteDatabase/get with no

Re: [IndexedDB] Closing connection in a versionchange transaction

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@chromium.org wrote: A spec oddity that we noticed - if you explicitly close a connection during an upgradeneeded handler (or elsewhere in the transaction), the transaction should complete (not abort) yet the connection fails (error), upgrading

Re: Pointer lock updated with clarification of lock and focus requirements.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Vincent Scheib sch...@google.com wrote: After discussion with Olli Pettay I have clarified portions of the pointer lock specification. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerlock/raw-file/default/index.html

Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Vincent Scheib sch...@google.com wrote: I have added onipointerlockchange and onpointerlockerror to the partial document IDL in the pointer lock specification. Webkit currently only defines these event handler attributes on document. Unless a reason is raised

Re: [webcomponents] linking using link rel=components href=...?

Hi Mike, the spec you're looking for is under development here: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/components/index.html :DG On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Mike Kamermans niho...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, I searched the archive at

Re: [webcomponents]: Making link rel=components produce DocumentFragments

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Dominic Cooney domin...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.comwrote: Here's one scenario where keeping components Documents might be a good idea. Suppose you just built a multi-threaded parser into your renderer

Re: CfC: move WebApps' test suites to Github; deadline March 22

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:40:18 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: As you probably know, the HTMLWG recently moved its test suite to GitHub (GH). Tobie, Robin, Odin, Ms2ger and others propose WebApps do the same and this is a Call for Consensus to do so. We support the move.