On Fri, 17 May 2013 03:40:16 +0400, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
It appears there is no longer sufficient interest to move the Widget
Updates on the Recommendation track so this is a Call for Consensus to
publish this spec as a WG Note and thus formally stop work on it.
Go
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:28:58 +0400, Charles McCathie Nevile
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
Hi,
at the face to face meeting we agreed to take back the work on a
manifest specification for apps, based on the current manifest draft
from sysapps [1] that was developed from the proposal [2]
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:19:53 +0400, Charles McCathie Nevile
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
Hi folks,
Dmitry started talking to people about getting together in the Bay Area
to talk through components, and ended up with a number of people
interested. Although we are past the deadline for a
If you go for standardizing an API for dealing with URIs (probably a
good idea if you go down this route) - then I would recommend being
inspired by the API of Java's java.net.URI
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/net/class-use/URI.html
The only thing that is not well handled by the
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
If you go for standardizing an API for dealing with URIs (probably a
good idea if you go down this route) - then I would recommend being
inspired by the API of Java's java.net.URI
On May 20, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com wrote:
Cool. Knowing what performance difference you see between multi-get and just
a bunch of gets in parallel (for time to delivery of the last value) will be
interesting. A multi-get of any sort should avoid a bunch of messaging
I'm person
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Ben Kelly bke...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hello all,
Recently I've been working on a mobile application that makes heavy use of
IndexedDB. In particular, there are times when this app must query a
potentially large, non-consecutive list of keys.
Anne wrote:
I don't really feel it's responsible to remove this feature at this
point without anyone involved in the original discussion speaking up.
Hi all,
you were involved in a discussion [1] regarding UMP and CORS back in 2010. I
know, it's a while ago, and apparently you had already
As promised in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013AprJun/0685.html,
I sketched out custom element declarative syntax using the last
completion value idea:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/custom/index.html#declaring-custom-elements
Please look it over.
Thank you.
- 1000 get() calls in single txn: ~1600ms
- getAll for all 1000 keys:~1200ms
I would expect getAll could have better than that.
It seems context switching between js and database is cheap. In that case,
cursor walk could even better perform.
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22130
Bug ID: 22130
Summary: Modification for clear and delete method
Classification: Unclassified
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
11 matches
Mail list logo