Hi Daniel,
On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote:
FWIW, I ran a dev poll last week: ~95% of respondents
What was the sample size? Who were the developers? Where was the poll run?
preferred a simple, separate HTML document specifically for their widget and
use all the
On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Hi,
In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three
conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2].
Could
This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming
interfaces. be clarified using one
I've been meaning to implement IndexedDB in some fashion for a while.
Earlier this month, shortly after the call for implementations, I realized
I should be getting on that. I've been working on an in-memory ECMAScript
implementation with fast data structures and the like. I also intend to
Finally, is there a good test suite? I can't seem to find anything in the
way of regression tests. I'll perhaps publish my own, if not.
+1, I've developed my own In-Memory implementation as a polyfill to
ignore a bug on Chrome regarding to files storage and I'm also
thinking about develop one
On 7/30/13 4:37 AM, ext pira...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally, is there a good test suite? I can't seem to find anything in the
way of regression tests. I'll perhaps publish my own, if not.
+1, I've developed my own In-Memory implementation as a polyfill to
ignore a bug on Chrome regarding to files
That were just the tests I was talking about, thanks :-) Unluckily it
seems they are not prepared to just give them to your IndexedDB
implementation and run them all at once, but it's a good starting
point.
2013/7/30 Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com:
On 7/30/13 4:37 AM, ext pira...@gmail.com
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:22:38 +0200, Daniel Buchner dan...@mozilla.com
wrote:
FWIW, I ran a dev poll last week: ~95% of respondents preferred
Sorry Daniel, but without a clear statement of methodology, selection of
respondents, and the actual questions, this is equivalent to my friends
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Hi,
In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three
conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2].
Could
This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Hi,
In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three
conformance clauses defined in WebIDL
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks.
Done. Spec now sez:
Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22840
Bug ID: 22840
Summary: JSON response and user defined JSON.parse
Classification: Unclassified
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
11 matches
Mail list logo