Re: Web Widgets, Where Art Thou?

2013-07-30 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Daniel, On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote: FWIW, I ran a dev poll last week: ~95% of respondents What was the sample size? Who were the developers? Where was the poll run? preferred a simple, separate HTML document specifically for their widget and use all the

Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL

2013-07-30 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Hi, In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. Could This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming interfaces. be clarified using one

IndexedDB: Thoughts on implementing IndexedDB

2013-07-30 Thread Austin William Wright
I've been meaning to implement IndexedDB in some fashion for a while. Earlier this month, shortly after the call for implementations, I realized I should be getting on that. I've been working on an in-memory ECMAScript implementation with fast data structures and the like. I also intend to

Re: IndexedDB: Thoughts on implementing IndexedDB

2013-07-30 Thread pira...@gmail.com
Finally, is there a good test suite? I can't seem to find anything in the way of regression tests. I'll perhaps publish my own, if not. +1, I've developed my own In-Memory implementation as a polyfill to ignore a bug on Chrome regarding to files storage and I'm also thinking about develop one

Re: IndexedDB: Thoughts on implementing IndexedDB

2013-07-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 7/30/13 4:37 AM, ext pira...@gmail.com wrote: Finally, is there a good test suite? I can't seem to find anything in the way of regression tests. I'll perhaps publish my own, if not. +1, I've developed my own In-Memory implementation as a polyfill to ignore a bug on Chrome regarding to files

Re: IndexedDB: Thoughts on implementing IndexedDB

2013-07-30 Thread pira...@gmail.com
That were just the tests I was talking about, thanks :-) Unluckily it seems they are not prepared to just give them to your IndexedDB implementation and run them all at once, but it's a good starting point. 2013/7/30 Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com: On 7/30/13 4:37 AM, ext pira...@gmail.com

Re: Web Widgets, Where Art Thou?

2013-07-30 Thread Charles McCathie Nevile
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:22:38 +0200, Daniel Buchner dan...@mozilla.com wrote: FWIW, I ran a dev poll last week: ~95% of respondents preferred Sorry Daniel, but without a clear statement of methodology, selection of respondents, and the actual questions, this is equivalent to my friends

Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL

2013-07-30 Thread Yves Lafon
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Hi, In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. Could This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application

Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL

2013-07-30 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Hi, In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL

Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL

2013-07-30 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks. Done. Spec now sez: Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this

[Bug 22840] New: JSON response and user defined JSON.parse

2013-07-30 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22840 Bug ID: 22840 Summary: JSON response and user defined JSON.parse Classification: Unclassified Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux