On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Thanks, that explains the concern.
>
> However the proposed solution doesn't seem to solve the problem
> particularly well, for two reasons:
>
> First off, an API which lets the website track how much data it is
> storing, measured in bytes,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
>> I think you might have misunderstood my initial comment.
>>
>> I agree that the current partial data solution is not good. I think we
>> should remove it.
>>
>
>
> I'd really like oth
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23072
Bug ID: 23072
Summary: Interaction with DeviceOrientation/Motion
Classification: Unclassified
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Sta
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
>
> Going back to the use case 2, let me try to explain a sample scenario:
>
> Let's say website A has stored some data in temporary storage. The amount of
> data was less than the per-site quota at the time (otherwise the write must
> have fai
resending to the right address.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi Eric, Arun, Jonas, All,
>
>
>
> On 8/19/13 7:44 PM, ext Eric U wrote:
>>
>> OK, I just finished making my way through the public-script-coord
>> thread [I'm not on that list, but someone pointed me to it].
On Aug 26, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi Eric, Arun, Jonas, All,
>
>
>> 2) Is any vendor other than Mozilla actually interested in this
>> proposal? When it was brought up on public-webapps, and at the
>> WebApps F2F, it dropped with a resounding thud.
>>
>> Given the standardiz
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16189
Bug 16189 depends on bug 16185, which changed state.
Bug 16185 Summary: Serialization of don't match browsers
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16185
What|Removed |Added
Hi Eric, Arun, Jonas, All,
On 8/19/13 7:44 PM, ext Eric U wrote:
OK, I just finished making my way through the public-script-coord
thread [I'm not on that list, but someone pointed me to it]. I have
no official objections to you editing a spec based on Jonas's
proposal, but I do have a couple
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2013 12:30 AM, "Kinuko Yasuda" wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Kinuko Yasuda
> wrote:
> >> >> Actually, *only* having onstoragechange would solve both
