Adding a best approach to the spec is a good idea.
Originally I thought that having a gamepadconnected callback (or some use
of the Gamepad API) would be enough of an indicator to prevent the UA from
manipulating the key presses / cursor movement.
The main scenarios I'm struggling to see as a
Editors - Robin created a new online pub rules checker that is now in
alpha http://pubrules.jit.su/.
If you have any comments about this service, please send them to
spec-p...@w3.org http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/.
Original Message
Subject:Early
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote:
My understanding from talking to various people is that at least part of the
problem comes from the type of code that is currently deployed in the wild.
An awful lot of it works around browser inconsistencies not through feature
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25090
Bug ID: 25090
Summary: Use document's encoding for url query encoding in XHR
open()
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25091
Bug ID: 25091
Summary: [imports]: Want to be used with data: URL scheme
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25091
Morrita Hajime morr...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote:
On 15/03/2014 18:44 , Johannes Wilm wrote:
yes btw -- where should one go to lobby in favor of the editing spec? I
have been communicating with several other browser-based editor
projects, and there seems to be a general
