+1
On 20 mar 2014 at 18:13:34, Luke Hoban wrote:
I agree that there is significant readability value to the consumer of a
WebIDL-
based API spec if the return types of Promise-returning APIs are captured in
the
IDL. For the same reason that documenting return types is valuable to
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
We could. Would love to see proposals for that. Right now the
specification for origin handling is fiction and as far as I know
there is no proposal that all involved parties agree to. An important
question is if we can fix
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
We could. Would love to see proposals for that. Right now the
specification for origin handling is fiction and as far as I know
there is no proposal
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24872
Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
On Mar 18, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Johannes Wilm johan...@fiduswriter.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote:
On 15/03/2014 18:44 , Johannes Wilm wrote:
yes btw -- where should one go to lobby in favor of the editing spec? I
have been communicating with
