Re: [clipboard events] Pasting scenarios and the shape of clipboardData.getData(‘text/html’) return value

How hard do you think this is to implement? Thanks for the code sample and thoughts! I'll run it by a few more developers to get deeper insight and get back to you. Great! Note that the code samples are just to get us started thinking about the issues we'll have to tackle if we're going to

[April2014Meeting] Building an Issue and Bug focused agenda

Hi All, The [Agenda] page for the April 10-11 meeting includes a list of Potential Topics and other than a meeting with some members of SysApps on April 10 to discuss the Service Worker and Manifest specs, currently, all other time slots are unallocated. Although we will allocate time slots

[April2014Meeting] Seeking status and plans from Editors not attending meeting; deadline April 9

Hi All, The people in the To: list are spec Editors that are not registered for WebApps' April 10-11 meeting. Since you _won't_ attend the meeting, I would appreciate it if you would please provide a short status, plans, expectations and such for your spec(s). In general: what are the major

[April2014Meeting] Plans and expectations for specs in CR; deadline April 9

[ Bcc: public-webapps-testsuite ] Hi All, WebApps currently has 7 specs in CR, and 4 of them have at least one Draft implementation report [Interop]. In preparation for the upcoming meeting, I would appreciate if by April 9 the Test Facilitators these CRs would please provide a short status,

[testing] Proposal: close public-webapps-testsuite

[ Bcc: public-test-infra; Advanced apologies for the cross-posting ] Hi All, WebApps created the [public-webapps-testsuite] (p-w-ts) list when the group's testing effort was centralized in hg/webapps/. Since then, the group adopted Github and [w-p-t] for its testing and all relevant

Re: [editing] insertHorizontalRule into p while its ancestor is non-editable

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Marta Pawlowska m.pawlow...@samsung.com wrote: Specification details that lead me to my conclusions: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/editing/raw-file/tip/editing.html#the-inserthorizontalrule-command - step 2. If p is not an allowed child of the editing host of node,

[fileapi-directories-and-system/filewriter]

Status: The specs are clearly dead; it's just been way down on my priority list to do anything about it. We should funnel it off to be a Note [or whatever the proper procedure is--Art?]. Eric

RE: [April2014Meeting] Seeking status and plans from Editors not attending meeting; deadline April 9

I will attend the meeting remotely. I assume there will be remote participation support. Re the Push API, we are working on an ED for TAG feedback and other input from browser vendors. An updated ED will be provided before the meeting. -Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow

Re: [fileapi-directories-and-system/filewriter]

On 4/2/14 12:36 PM, ext Eric U wrote: Status: The specs are clearly dead; it's just been way down on my priority list to do anything about it. We should funnel it off to be a Note [or whatever the proper procedure is--Art?]. Thanks for the quick reply Eric. When a group agrees to stop

CfC: publish WG Notes of File API: Writer and File API: Directories and System; deadline April 9

Per Eric's e-mail earlier today [1], this is a Call for Consensus for WebApps to stop work on the File API Writer and File API: Directories and System specs and to publish a WG Note for these two specs. If this CfC passes, I propose removing the technical content of the Notes (like we did

Re: [April2014Meeting] Building an Issue and Bug focused agenda

On April 2, 2014 at 6:51:06 AM, Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote: * Manifest; led by Marcos; high priority issues, bugs, etc. High-priority v1: * orientation hinting * Implementer interest  * should we freeze v1, go to LC?  V2 feature set: * url scope * service workers * what

Re: [April2014Meeting] Building an Issue and Bug focused agenda

On Apr 2, 2014, at 6:50 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: File API; led by Jonas (will Arun join remotely?); which high priority bugs need discussion; status of LC processing; next steps If a dial-in is provided, I’d be delighted to join remotely. — A*

[Bug 25240] New: Blob.close() shouldn't throw when invoked more than once.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25240 Bug ID: 25240 Summary: Blob.close() shouldn't throw when invoked more than once. Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All

[Bug 25241] New: FileReader.readAsXxx methods should not throw on CLOSED

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25241 Bug ID: 25241 Summary: FileReader.readAsXxx methods should not throw on CLOSED Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All

[Bug 25081] Make read operation really async

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25081 Bug 25081 depends on bug 24576, which changed state. Bug 24576 Summary: Calling URL.createObjectURL() on a closed Blob https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24576 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 24576] Calling URL.createObjectURL() on a closed Blob

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24576 Arun a...@mozilla.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 25242] New: Blob.close should not set the blob's size to 0 or cause slice() to throw

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25242 Bug ID: 25242 Summary: Blob.close should not set the blob's size to 0 or cause slice() to throw Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: