Things I think are important:
* asynchronous get/put
* iterators on sorted keys (so we can implement efficient indexes and
nice streaming abstractions)
* batch put/del - not sure if it already has this, but these are super
necessary for implementing custom indexing schemes
* binary keys - combined
https://gist.github.com/maxogden/11031041
Replying on behalf of maxogden who can't seem to get access to the mailing
list.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Tim Caswell t...@creationix.com wrote:
Personally, the main thing
Our current performance suite is @
https://github.com/pouchdb/pouchdb/tree/master/tests/performance
Its at a fairly abstract level above idb, and right now its not
particularly clean, but it should be easy enough to get running,
instructions @
I don't see it on the wiki, so resuggesting storing blobs with partial
blobs, as discussed here
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/0657.html
Regards
Aymeric
Le 16/04/2014 20:49, Joshua Bell a écrit :
At the April 2014 WebApps WG F2F [1] there was general agreement
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Dale Harvey d...@arandomurl.com wrote:
Our current performance suite is @
https://github.com/pouchdb/pouchdb/tree/master/tests/performance
Its at a fairly abstract level above idb, and right now its not particularly
clean, but it should be easy enough to get
on 18/04/2014 02:59, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On April 17, 2014 at 12:21:06 PM, Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote:
I also noticed: the REC
has a link to an ED
that now 404s and the
errata doc has a link to a differences document that now returns an error.
Cindy, Yves - would one of
On 4/18/14 10:53 AM, ext Xiaoqian Cindy Wu wrote:
on 18/04/2014 02:59, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On April 17, 2014 at 12:21:06 PM, Arthur Barstow
(art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote:
I also noticed: the REC
has a link to an ED
that now 404s and the
errata doc has a link to a differences document that
On April 18, 2014 at 11:05:04 AM, Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote:
On 4/18/14 10:53 AM, ext Xiaoqian Cindy Wu wrote:
Yes, this is getting much better; thanks Cindy!
There is still a bug with the errata doc's differences document link
(i.e. it still returns an error):
[[
Travis has now closed the last open bug [1] for DOM Parsing and
Serialization so this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD of
the spec, using the following ED as the basis:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/innerhtml/raw-file/tip/index.html
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to
Hi, folks–
I'd like to ask for feedback on the notion of adding addressable
ranges to the WebApps WG charter.
There are a set of use cases for being able to link to a specific
passage of text in a document, which has a number of what I consider
hard problems:
* the passage might cross
10 matches
Mail list logo
