On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
I slightly worry about the performance implications of this and the number
of changes to UAs this will require: any place inside a UA that examines
attribute values (only for global attributes?) would need to consult this
I'm still trying to grasp the philosophy behind shadow trees.
Sometimes it's explained as exposing the primitives but the more I
learn (rather slowly, this time at BlinkOn) the more it looks like a
bunch of new primitives.
We cannot explain input still, but since we allow going inside the
shadow
On 15/05/2014 12:05, Charles McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru
wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014 21:12:51 +0200, Marcos mar...@marcosc.com wrote:
On May 14, 2014 at 2:48:12 PM, Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@gmail.com)
wrote:
[ Bcc: www-tag; please Reply-to: public-webapps ]
If you have any
On 5/16/14, 12:36 AM, Daniel Appelquist wrote:
On 15/05/2014 12:05, Charles McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014 21:12:51 +0200, Marcos mar...@marcosc.com wrote:
On May 14, 2014 at 2:48:12 PM, Arthur Barstow (art.bars...@gmail.com)
wrote:
[ Bcc: www-tag; please
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Soledad Penadés s...@mozilla.com wrote:
And that's where I suggested leaving attribute handling to the component. If
it self-registers as handling a certain attribute, then don't let the UA
handle it as it would do if unregistered.
Very much like the idea.
A
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
I was thinking about the latter and that would not work if the URL was
revoked. Unless we store origin at parse time.
Good point. Without using the explicit syntax we couldn't return a
consistent result for the origin.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
I was thinking about the latter and that would not work if the URL was
revoked. Unless we store origin at parse time.
Good point. Without
