Re: [Custom] Custom elements and ARIA

2014-08-28 Thread Ms2ger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/28/2014 01:42 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: TL;DR: we (Google) are trying to explain the platform with custom elements [citation needed] on explain the platform. - -- Ms2ger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

RE: [Custom] Custom elements and ARIA

2014-08-28 Thread Domenic Denicola
Hi Steve, thanks greatly for your help. It's clear now that I should have reached out to you for your expertise directly before being very wrong on a public mailing list :) From: Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.com It appears (please correct me) you have made the assumption that 'strong

RE: [Custom] Custom elements and ARIA

2014-08-28 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: Nick Krempel ndkrem...@google.com Have you considered allowing ARIA attributes to be set on a shadow root. The semantics would be that the browser uses the value of an ARIA attribute on the (most recent) shadow root for an element, and only if it's not set there will it fall back to

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec

2014-08-28 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Daniel Appelquist wrote: As you might know, the new charter for webapps includes a new version of the URL spec. I am acting as editor of this spec. What's the purpose of the W3C republishing this spec? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec

2014-08-28 Thread Glenn Adams
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Daniel Appelquist wrote: As you might know, the new charter for webapps includes a new version of the URL spec. I am acting as editor of this spec. What's the purpose of the W3C republishing this

RfC: LCWD of Battery Status API; deadline October 2

2014-08-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
WebApps received a Request for Comments re DAPWG's August 28 Last Call WD of Battery Status API (last published as a [CR], see [Diff]): http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-battery-status-20140828/ Individual WG members are encouraged to provide individual feedback. If anyone in WebApps wants

RE: [Custom] Custom elements and ARIA

2014-08-28 Thread Domenic Denicola
Thanks to all for their responses. The fact that I misread a bunch of authoring requirements as UA requirements made things a lot more complicated than they are in reality. I updated my ARIA summary [1] and illustrative scenarios [2] to reflect the actual spec/browser behavior. And, given the

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec

2014-08-28 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Glenn Adams wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Daniel Appelquist wrote: As you might know, the new charter for webapps includes a new version of the URL spec. I am acting as editor of this spec.

Re: [Custom] Custom elements and ARIA

2014-08-28 Thread Daniel Freedman
Why not put the `implicitAria` role on the element's prototype? That way each instance can override with the attribute in a naive and natural manner: `el.role = link`. This would necessitate some getter/setter logic for the aria properties to handle the something like the details case with