Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-01-31 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 5:58 AM, fantasai fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net wrote: -webkit-appearance: none isn't a proprietary extension, it's a prefixed version of something that was once in a standards-track document. It got removed because there were serious design problems with the original

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-01-31 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Tantek Çelik tan...@cs.stanford.edu wrote: I'm tracking the state of requests for 'appearance' here: https://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css4-ui#appearance Feel free to directly edit that wiki page and add more concrete data / research that you think will help make a

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-01-31 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote: Sure, that works for this example (which was created in a huge rush at the last minute before a talk, like probably 90% of my productive work), but I don't believe it wouldn't work for

Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope?

2015-01-31 Thread Paul Libbrecht
On 31 janv. 2015, at 14:48, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen hst...@mozilla.com wrote: If yes, do any of the other mandatory types have gotchas like Windows HTML Format - on any platform? The mandatory types currently are: text/plain text/uri-list text/csv text/css text/html

Re: [clipboard API] platform integration stuff - in spec or out of scope?

2015-01-31 Thread Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
I don't know what these map to on platforms that do not use MIME types to describe clipboard contents. Should this information be dug up and included? First request: can we add the three MathML media-types? I know you've brought this up before, I haven't done anything about it and it's partly