On 2/24/15 3:37 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
The registration page for the April 24 Web Components f2f meeting at
Google's Mount View CA office is now open:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42538/webcomponents-042015/
The meeting/agenda page is:
Lastly, if there is a decision to continue to work on this API I can remain
as main editor. However, I can currently not commit to more extensive tasks
such as implementation and test cases.
Claes
Do you have information on W3C members committed to implementation test cases
going
Hi again Frederick,
I plan to issue a CFC for moving the TCP and UDP Socket API specification to a
CG. However, before that, do you think that one option could be DAP? I assume
that would require a modified charter.
BR
Claes
Claes Nilsson
Master Engineer - Web Research
Advanced
Hi Frederick,
The implementations I am aware of are:
* Mozilla FFOS: There is an ongoing implementation of the UDP API. See
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745283
* Crosswalk: An experimental implementation of the old, non-stream-based
version. See
Hi All,
A new Working Draft publication of IME API is planned for April 9 using
the following version as the basis:
http://w3c.github.io/ime-api/TR.html
If anyone has any major concerns about this, please reply right away.
A few notes about this spec:
* Travis is now the sole Editor of
On 2015-04-07 07:07, Nilsson, Claes1 wrote:
Hi Frederick,
The implementations I am aware of are:
* Mozilla FFOS: There is an ongoing implementation of the UDP API. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745283
* Crosswalk: An experimental implementation of the old,
