[Bug 28659] [Shadow]: Remove Section 8. HTML Elements and Their Shadow Trees from the spec

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28659 Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 27844] [Shadow]: Element.createShadowRoot() throws an exception for some elements

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27844 Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

PSA: Web Components vs Extract Widget patent

Hi All, For those interested in Web Components, please note I received a related e-mail titled Web Components vs Extract Widget patent. I forwarded this e-mail (which has an attachment) to the www-archive list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015May/0008.html Please do NOT

Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots?

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote: Given that all vendors agreed that C can wait until v2, we could just focus on concretizing the slots proposal and then put a lid on Shadow DOM v1. What do you think, folks? This probably works for Mozilla. It would