I've discussed this issue with some of Edge's key parser developers. From a
technical ground, we do not have a problem with stopping the parser to callout
to author code in order to run a constructor, either during parsing or cloning.
For example, in parsing, I would expect that the callout
On 07/16/2015 03:45 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
Hi all,
Ahead of next week's F2F, I'm trying to pull together some clarifying and
stage-setting materials, proposals, lists of open issues, etc. In the
end, they all get blocked on one key question:
**Is it OK to run author code during
Hi all,
I'm developing an web-based editor which can edit HTML documents locally
(stored in indexedDB).
An issue I encountered is that there is no reliable way to ensure that
at most one editor instance (an instance is a web page) can open a
document at the same time.
* An editor instance
Based on similar feedback, I've been noodling on this too. Here are my
current thoughts:
https://gist.github.com/inexorabletash/a53c6add9fbc8b9b1191
Feedback welcome - I was planning to send this around shortly anyway.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:07 AM, 段垚 duan...@ustc.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I'm
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26676
Bug 26676 depends on bug 27865, which changed state.
Bug 27865 Summary: Merge fullscreen element stack into top layer
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27865
What|Removed |Added
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27865
Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27863
Bug 27863 depends on bug 27865, which changed state.
Bug 27865 Summary: Merge fullscreen element stack into top layer
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27865
What|Removed |Added
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
As many SW participants are going to be in town for the WebApps F2F on the
21st, Google San Francisco is hosting a working day, 9am-5pm PST on July
20th to work through open issues and discuss future work.
If you're
Yeah, I think a standalone primitive for asynchronous atomics. The
big risk is of course that deadlocks can occur, but there's no real
way to completely avoid that while keeping a flexible platform. These
deadlocks would be asynchronous, so no thread will hang, but you can
easily end up with two
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26677
Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
10 matches
Mail list logo
