On Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:26 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:15 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
What I'm asking for is a more unified proposal that says If you
have already implemented AppCache, here's what you add to make the
same cache provide the additional functionality
On Monday, July 20, 2009 1:43 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
On Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:46 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
On Jul 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
...
Does the situation change if I am building an application from
On Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:46 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
On Jul 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
I agree with Jonas and I'd like to understand the expected use cases
better too. I think I get the point that making the network access
seamless regardless of whether
On Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi Nikunj,
So one of the things I've never fully understood with your proposal is
what usage patterns people are going to want to use this new API with.
[snip]
/ Jonas
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Nikunj R.
On Wednesday, June 24, 2009 6:39 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
I cannot comment on behalf of Opera on this. I can point out that Safari 4
and Chrome 2
ship with it and that Firefox 3.5 will too. (No implementation will
On Wednesday, June 24, 2009 8:25 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Adrian Bateman
adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 24, 2009 6:39 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
I cannot comment
On Tuesday, June 09, 2009 6:57 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Hi,
The spec states [1]:
The key(n) method must return the name of the nth key in the list.
The order of keys is user-agent defined, but must be consistent
within an object between changes to the number of keys. (Thus,
On Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:13 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Local display of images before uploading them requires being able to
take a File object and poke it into parts of the platform that
currently only take URLs. I suggest that the way we
through the mails and respond with our comments.
Cheers,
Ade.
--
Adrian Bateman
Program Manager - Internet Explorer - Microsoft Corporation
Phone: +1 (425) 538 5111
E-mail: mailto:adria...@microsoft.com
-Original Message-
From: public-html-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-html-requ...@w3.org
of
renaming the Origin header, we'd prefer the option to keep it as is and have
the name for CSRF changed in HTML 5 as Ian raised [1] if possible.
Cheers,
Adrian.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/0060.html
--
Adrian Bateman
Program Manager - Internet Explorer
On January 14, 2009 11:45 AM, Anne van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@opera.com] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:36:12 +0100, Bil Corry b...@corry.biz wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote on 1/14/2009 12:53 PM:
The problem I think is that the current name, 'Origin', is extremely
generic and so it's likely to
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
