Doc in progress at
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Type-Extensions.md
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com
wrote:
Folks,
I agree with Anne that we've been having a somewhat circular re-discovery
of the pros/cons here. I believe
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com
wrote:
- In the time between v1 and v2 (however long that ends up being) we are
left without any way to solve this problem, assuming we don't come up
Did anyone have any further thoughts on this? My concerns haven't changed.
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 8, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote:
Did anyone have any further thoughts on this? My concerns haven't
changed.
Nothing new.
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 8, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 8, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote:
Web developers
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote:
I definitely acknowledge is= may not be the ideal solution to the latter
problem - it definitely has some holes in it, especially when you start
I agree we badly need the primitives, but it seems to me like there is
potentially an easier and maybe even bigger win in making it more
straightforward for developers to reuse existing patterns (like the one you
described for button earlier) than in explaining the existing patterns
and allowing
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Léonie Watson lwat...@paciellogroup.com
wrote:
My understanding is that sub-classing would give us the accessibility
inheritance we were hoping is= would provide. Apologies if I've
element, they'd modify an attribute on it, rather than
the input, right? So you'd have to keep them in sync regardless.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2015, at 11:05 AM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Brian
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Alice Boxhall aboxh...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote
10 matches
Mail list logo
