Hi all,
Push API draft has been migrated to the W3C GitHub repo:
https://github.com/w3c/push-api
Current version implements just part of the changes indicated in my email some
days ago.
Regards,
Eduardo.
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su
Hi Arnaud,
On 29 abr 2014 at 14:03:46, arnaud.br...@orange.com wrote:
EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA wrote on App Server - Push Server protocol: Mozilla
and Google to kick-off a:
be available ?
- Change references to webapp = service worker where it might be
unclear that only Service Workers
On 30 abr 2014 at 00:13:14, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:00 AM, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA e...@tid.es
wrote:
Hi all,
Last week the Push API editors (ATT, Telefónica) and other interested
parties (Mozilla, Google) met to progress this specification. It was a very
productive
On 30 abr 2014 at 16:52:49, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 4/30/14 10:44 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
I'll work with Mike/Robin to create a new push-api project, unless
you request otherwise. OK?
Eduardo - Mike created this project https://github.com/w3c/push-api.
Thanks! Once we deal with open pull
Hi all,
Last week the Push API editors (ATT, Telefónica) and other interested parties
(Mozilla, Google) met to progress this specification. It was a very productive
meeting in which great support was shown to this piece of work and consensus
was reached around many topics under discussion.
of changes and asking from
feedback from other parties. But sorry if my email has led to any
misunderstanding.
Regards,
Eduardo.
On 29 abr 2014 at 15:42:40, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
Hi Eduardo, all,
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:00:15 +0200, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA e...@tid.es
wrote:
Hi all
+1
On 20 mar 2014 at 18:13:34, Luke Hoban wrote:
I agree that there is significant readability value to the consumer of a
WebIDL-
based API spec if the return types of Promise-returning APIs are captured in
the
IDL. For the same reason that documenting return types is valuable to
Hi,
On 12 jul 2013 at 00:10:49, pira...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems it still make a distintion between Push Server and Application
Server. Wouldn't a webapp send some data to a Push Server so it gets
distributed on all the registered instances without needing to deploy
a custom Application Server?
Hi,
There is a new version of the Push API draft available at [1]
The API has been simplified with regards to the previous version and is aligned
with Mozilla's SimplePush API [2] used by the Firefox OS notification solution
under development.
Looking forward to getting your feedback on
Hi Jonas,
Thanks for your feedback. See comments inline.
Regards,
Eduardo.
On 6 oct 2012 at 00:06:53, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi All,
As usual, this is not the official mozilla position, as there is no such
thing.
Several of us at at mozilla has been looking at push quite a bit
lately. We
On 27 sep 2012 at 05:51:51, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Art. I've responded below. I will work on a new
draft to address as many of your comments as I can.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT
+1-425-580-6514
Arthur Barstow wrote on September 26, 2012
Hi all,
Bryan Sullivan and myself have been working together on updating the Push API
draft based upon feedback received and the work being driven by Mozilla and
Telefonica to build a Push solution for Firefox OS (B2G).
You can find it at: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html
Hi all,
First of all let me introduce myself. I work for Telefónica, I am based in
Madrid and I have recently joined the WebApps WG.
I find very interesting the proposal to specify a Web Apps manifest and thus it
is the first topic around which I want to start contributing to the group, even
13 matches
Mail list logo
