On 9/12/13, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013 2:16 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
FWD'ing to put my reply back on list (and to others)...
On Sep 11, 2013 6:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
As far as I can tell Element.prototype.matches
FWD'ing to put my reply back on list (and to others)...
On Sep 11, 2013 6:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
As far as I can tell Element.prototype.matches() is not deployed yet.
Should we instead make selectors first-class citizens, just like
regular expressions, and have
var sel
On 8/6/11, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
[...]
I've stated in prior threads, that unless the word is aria-* or data-*,
properties are set on the element.
I see. But that's inherently inconsistent and mostly misleading
(attr alludes to attribute not usually property except when it's
On 8/6/11, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On 8/6/2011 9:05 AM, Dominic Cooney wrote:
Element.create looks neat. Three thoughts:
...
Let me briefly reiterate that I think we want *both* Element.create
and constructors; they have complementary uses.
I agree.
And for no reason, it
On 8/4/11, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
ser-generated function function.
The scope of handler attributes is explained in HTML 5, though
incompletely:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#event-handler-content-attributes
That's incomplete.
Correction
On 8/4/11, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:31:04 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2,
On 8/2/11, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
In an IRC discussion with Ian Hickson and Tab Atkins, we can up with the
following idea for
On 7/19/11, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Ian Hickson:
Is this still something I should do, or did this get resolved using
another solution?
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8241
The proposed solution I made in the bug was to have the [[Get]] etc.
internal methods of
On 7/8/11, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
As a background for the wider Component Model discussion, I put
together an overview of the general behavior attachment problem on the
Web:
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Behavior_Attachment
Please take a look. Comments, additions, and
On 6/29/11, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Folks!
With use cases (http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Component_Model_Use_Cases)
firmed up, and isolation
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0900.html),
inheritance
On 6/23/11, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Jun/23/2011 6:45 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:36:07 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
ann...@opera.com wrote:
I just checked in the proposal
https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/dom-core/changeset/b9bb17789db9 into DOM
Core
On 6/3/11, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote:
You now have:
One more list to unsubscribe from.
http://www.w3c-test.org:81/
http://www.w3c-test.org:82/
http://www.w3c-test.org:83/
| function assert_readonly(object, property_name, description)
| {
| var initial_value =
On 5/6/11, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for your consideration.
It sounds like the group wants to proceed by looking first at missing
primitives.
Missing primitives? What do you mean?
--
Garrett
On 5/2/11, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote:
Apologies. I feel like I have failed to properly contextualize this issue.
Let me back up and see if I can't help create a different frame of
reference. This email is already too long so I've avoided examples.
Please let me know what isn't
On 4/28/11, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
For what it's worth, the way Gecko implements this is by inserting an
object into the prototype chain of the Window that handles these
property gets. This means that |var| (which defines a prop on the
Window itself) will always shadow the
On 4/28/11, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 04/28/2011 04:46 AM, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
Would be good to know what are the use cases you had in mind.
I'm never sure if I'm using the term use case correctly =-).
Our primary motivator is the needs of web applications,
And
On 4/19/11, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Apr/18/2011 12:29 PM, ext Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
The superfluous, badly worded maladvice remains: Within each test one
may have a number of asserts.
Awkward
On 4/18/11, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
The superfluous, badly worded maladvice remains: Within each test one
may have a number of asserts.
Awkward wording to explicitly mention that such bad
On 4/6/11, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Apr/3/2011 6:31 PM, ext Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
[...]
I think all of the substantive comments to date only affect the proposed
Approval page. I'll notify the list
On 4/6/11, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Apr/6/2011 11:22 AM, ext Garrett Smith wrote:
On 4/6/11, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Apr/3/2011 6:31 PM, ext Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
[...]
I
On 4/4/11, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/4/11, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote:
(setting followup to public-testinfra)
On 04/04/2011 01:45 AM, Garrett Smith wrote:
I'd rather see the `format_value` function broken up. It makes
non-standard expectations of host
On 3/31/11, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi All,
During the 2011 TPAC meeting, I agreed to an action (action-611) to work
with Chaals and WebApps' Team Contacts to define the group's testing
processes.
To that end, I created the following documents:
1.
On 2/28/11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:47:54 +0100, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Your example is simple. But some common cases of synth events are
complicated. UI Events aren't so bad but MouseEvents and especially
TouchEvents are a lot
On 3/1/11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:48 +0100, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
| DOM Core defines the event and document model the Web platform uses.
That says that DOM Core defines two different things: events and DOM.
Some things might
On 2/28/11, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Friday, February 25, 2011 1:54 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The idea is to provide a better definition of the events model at a
more
appropriate location. I do not think DOM Level 3 Events is the right
way
forward, but I am
On 2/27/11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:51:12 +0100, Joseph Pecoraro pecor...@apple.com
wrote:
This gets especially hairy when the user + password parameters are
needed, and there is a magic boolean in the middle:
On 2/25/11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 04:05:44 +0100, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK. Why not expose a generic version of `fire` to the scripting
environment?
I do not know of any research (or have done any myself) as to how often
On 2/25/11, João Eiras joao.ei...@gmail.com wrote:
On , Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/25/11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 04:05:44 +0100, Garrett Smith
dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
Most cases for synth events are for testing
On 2/24/11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
For DOM Core Ms2ger and I (and some others on IRC) decided to introduce a
subtle distinction between fire and dispatch. Dispatching is actually
going through the list of event targets with an initialized event whereas
firing is initializing
On 2/20/11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
I believe that http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM4Core/DOM4Core.html is the
latest definition of ElementTraversal around where it moves the various
attributes to Element. However, childElementCount is not included. Is it
the plan to nuke
On 10/31/10, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Garrett Smith:
[...]
The difference here is that the object that was passed in uses normal
ES syntax; it's pass by value (value of reference) not referenced by
the object. The effect is what you wanted, I think, and that is that
1
On 10/29/10, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Cameron McCormack:
I don’t know that sequence is appropriate for this. They are meant
to be for pass-by-value lists.
Anne van Kesteren:
I'm not sure I follow this. Could you elaborate a bit?
As currently defined, sequence types are
On 10/19/10, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/19/10, Scott Shattuck idea...@mindspring.com wrote:
[...]
I don't generally write code that accesses an indexed property of a
collection unless I know that the element at that index exists. I
recall now a piece of code -- jQuery
On 10/26/10, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Anne van Kesteren:
Yeah, it would be nice if sequence mapped to that so that NodeList
could be defined as a sequence instead, same for StyleSheetList,
etc. And then Web IDL would take care of all the details rather than
each specification.
No browsers do that. I'd say leave it as is.
I don't think any browser exposes these currently via addEventListener/
removeEventListener, but they do participate in the event dispatch
order. Another way to look at it is: they are added, but the function
created from the attribute is not
On 10/18/10, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 10/18/10 9:34 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
\.item\(\d+\s*\)\s*===\s*null lang:javascript
Doesn't catch cases when the argument to item is not a numeric constant,
most simply.
Or a reference like `i`, `foo.bar`, `f[d]`, `f[ d ]`
\.item
On 10/19/10, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 03:11:25 +0200, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au
wrote:
Does it particularly matter that collection.item(999) returns null while
collection['999'] evaluates to undefined? To me, it makes sense enough.
Functions and
On 10/19/10, Scott Shattuck idea...@mindspring.com wrote:
Seems to me that when you access a slot that in some sense doesn't exist
it should return undefined, not null. There are plenty of semantic cases (is
this attribute defined but currently unset, or not defined at all) where the
On 10/18/10, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 10/18/10 8:51 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
When DOM was first spec'ed the collection interfaces all had some kind
of item method. These methods sometimes return like null[1] and
sometimes other values such as an empty string [2]. The
On 10/5/10, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
sysbot+trac...@w3.org wrote:
ISSUE-145 (event handler ordering): Ordering event handlers registered by
different means [DOM3 Events]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/145
Raised by: Doug Schepers
On product: DOM3 Events
On 9/21/10, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
How about setParameter(name, value...) that takes var_args number of values?
Alternately, it could take either a DOMString or an ArrayDOMString for the
value. I prefer the var_args.
Why?
A user-defined fallback will be necessary for a while.
On 9/20/10, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
On 20.09.2010 09:22, Garrett Smith wrote:
...
I see setParameterValues there. Useful to build URLs for XHR. But OTOH
-- Ajax that is using a lot of parameters, might be better using a
form. Usually Ajax requests are simple requests
with the XMLHttpRequest use
cases because XMLHttpRequest is a popular API for use in workers.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Where is Dictionary defined?
It might not be defined yet.
You don't know if it is defined or not? Makes no sense at all.
What
On 9/17/10, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
I've removed the searchParameters attribute from the URL interface for
the time being. We can consider adding it back at a later time.
;_;
Just today my cubemate
On 9/17/10, Devdatta Akhawe dev.akh...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
You mean you didn't mention that I drafted a much better one over two
years ago?
Garrett : could you send a link to your ES4 draft/proposal ? My simple
google skills couldn't find it.
I thought I linked to that earlier but don't
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM, kari.hiit...@nokia.com wrote:
On 10/15/09 21:04, ext João Eiras jo...@opera.com wrote:
Hi,
I suppose that the interest Olli mentioned was ours (Nokia).
Unfortunately there was a long delay before we were able to participate
the discussion and release
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
Hi all,
there seems to be some interest to standardize touch and gesture events.
Please provide links to where interest was indicated.
Especially valuable are where mobile companies have provided
information about the
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com wrote:
I figure I could rewrite Jonas' proposal to make it more palatable (at least
to me) and satisfy the use cases and priorities I mentioned in [1]. Here's
his proposal to combine with File and FileData from the current
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com
wrote:
I figure I could rewrite Jonas' proposal to make it more palatable
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Lachlan Huntlachlan.h...@lachy.id.au
wrote:
And overload the querySelector() and querySelectorAll() methods to also
accept a Selector object as the selector
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Mike Wilson mike...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yes, the base for event delegation is certainly something
like that. I just wanted to make clear that the main reason
for adding this functionality (IMO) is event delegation.
I'll let event delegation library creators
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 9/24/09 6:29 AM, Sean Hogan wrote:
I would be surprised if an implementation didn't create an internal
lookup table keyed off the selector text.
Gecko doesn't. Webkit doesn't.
I just checked really quickly, and on
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 9/24/09 2:17 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Boris Zbarskybzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Gecko doesn't. Webkit doesn't.
I just checked really quickly, and on my machine (a year-plus old laptop
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to look at beginning work on Selectors API v2 soon to add a
number of requested features that didn't make it into the first version.
This e-mail is a summary of what is being considered, and is
In looking at the credits, I noticed all of:
Bjoern Hoehrmann, Björn Hoehrmann, Björn Höhrmann, Bjoern H�hrmann
I am not sure if there are two similar BH, as Björn and Bjoern.
Entities for the characters should be used.
I also see my name on there, though misspelled.
Garrett
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Travis Leitheadtra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Cameron et al.,
[snip]
behavior available in three of the four
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Nikunj R.
Mehtanikunj.me...@oracle.com wrote:
Here's an alternative, more easily extensible, proposal for reading files.
It provides applications a way to read small amounts of data at a time. It
also allows applications to concurrently read the same file.
I
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Travis Leitheadtra...@microsoft.com wrote:
Cameron et al.,
I have a couple pieces of feedback on this draft.
Let me start by saying that this is a wonderful spec—much needed by the
working group, and much appreciated by the IE team in relation to the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Aaron Boodman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 8/17/09 12:33 AM, Michael Nordman wrote:
Strictly speaking, I think the seperate 'Reader' class makes for a more
(posting order moved to the bottom).
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Michael Nordmanmicha...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Here is an alternative proposal
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Here is an alternative proposal for an API for reading files:
[snip proposal]
As stated, I'm not convinced that this is a better solution than what
the spec currently does. The only advantage I can see is that it
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Anne van Kesterenann...@opera.com wrote:
On
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
Good to get more notice on the API, but saying things like Arun is a
great guy in that same entry indicates impartiality.
He's a reasonably good guy, though :-)
And what does that say about
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
In glancing at some of the methods in FileAPI, I noticed some coding
errors.
The status code and a getData method could be designed as
properties of one object.
Replace the callback's parameter
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Dan Connolly wrote:
Looks like the word is getting out about this work;
there's a pretty favorable article on ajaxian.
http://ajaxian.com/archives/w3c-publish-first-working-draft-of-file-api
But it's a little
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 8/11/09 11:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
My concern isn't that there are ways of using it correctly, my concern
is that it's very easy to use incorrectly with bugs as a result.
How? Especially if we prevent more than
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Anne van Kesterenann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:04:28 +0200, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com
wrote:
In the case of file read APIs, simply getting the data asynchronously is
In glancing at some of the methods in FileAPI, I noticed some coding
errors. It seems you've made an assignment in an if statement and
assigned the result to window.status. I've annotated these with
comment (GS).
First, an overview explanation:
2009/8/5 Darin Adler da...@apple.com:
On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:42 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
2009/8/1 João Eiras jo...@opera.com:
How can one in a script check for UA support?
else if(localStorage){}
does not work for Opera**.
This obviously does not work because you need to prefix
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
I still want to know: Why would a program want to know the object's
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
Please show the subsequent use cases you've studied and please do
publish your studies.
What I meant by use cases was this exchange:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Anne van Kesterenann...@opera.com wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:35:16 +0200, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
The input event does not apply to radio/checkbox. (This is stated in the
radio/checkbox sectons.)
Probably a carry-over from WF 2.0, which
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Garrett,
Thanks for taking the time to review this.
Garrett Smith wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileUpload/publish/FileAPI.xhtml
Why does the URI contain the date 2006?
It certainly is confusing
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Garrett Smithdhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
Progress-type Events are useful because the API is asynchronous.
What if reading the file times out?
If an entire directory is uploaded, as in the
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
Local display of images before uploading them requires being able to take
a File object and poke it into parts of the platform that currently only
take URLs. I suggest that the
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Garrett Smith wrote:
I still want to know: Why would a program want to know the object's
[[Class]]?
It shouldn't, but [[Class]]es are exposed by ECMAScript objects in their
toString() method and thus
On 6/20/09, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Ian Hickson:
I don't really mind exactly what the solution is; my only concern here
would be that I'd be throwing [PrototypeRoot] around a lot.
Acknowledged. If you can propose a way of defining this without needing
to use [PrototypeRoot]
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Cameron McCormack:
Seems reasonable to state that. I’ve added a note to do that when
I get some time to allocate to editing Web IDL again.
Oliver Hunt:
I actually thought about this some more, and realised i'm not
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Done:
The value of the internal [[Class]] property of a host object is
determined as follows:
* If the host object implements a single interface, then the value
of
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Hi folks,
unfortunately I have not been able to catch up with Doug (a combination of
both of us travelling and then I had a minor accident that put me out of
commission for a while), so as far as I know we have no
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 2/25/09 7:46 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Hi folks,
unfortunately I have not been able to catch up with Doug (a combination
of
both
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:08:56 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
I agree. Not sure
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
I agree. Not sure if that is what you want to do before or after getting the
load/error/abort event though?
I should mention that I'm not particularly married to having things one way
or another
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do like the symmetry in the current proposal where loadstart is the
first thing that fires, and loadend is the last thing. Seems very
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24
Hopefully this draft is ready for last call. So please
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
But it does require an unforgeable user click to bring it up, so you can't
spam it or make it pop up at carefully controlled times. Might not be a huge
risk but I
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 17, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
Hey Chaals, What makes you think that your pious and arrogant attitude
makes you a moderator? You have no right to dictate what I can say.
The fact that Chaals
Hey Chaals, What makes you think that your pious and arrogant attitude
makes you a moderator? You have no right to dictate what I can say.
And this:
Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Doug Schepers [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Olli Pettay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Erik Dahlström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello webapps wg,
On behalf of the SVG WG I'd like to propose adding to the ProgressEvents
spec[1
things at the moment, then maybe Mozilla can
take the initiative.
Thanks,
Garrett
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver, Maciej - have you given this any thought?
I'd like to get some discussion going for this. I'll write the failing
tests, but I
. How about complete?
If the complete event fires before fail or succeed fire then the
please wait, loading would be removed first. That seems to be the
more desirable effect to fulfill the use case.
Garrett
/ Jonas
Garrett Smith wrote:
On 9/10/07, Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Boris Zbarsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
Java does not include null value for String type. You can ignore the
null type and just pretend that null can be of any reference type, but
that does not make null a string.
Any Java method
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
So it says to first remove all children, and then do nothing more. Do you
share this interpretation for this one attribute?
Yes.
So at this point I want to ask though: What is your proposal
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Boris Zbarsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
I contend that the textContent example is not designed in a useful
manner and that having null - sometimes and null - null others
introduces complexity.
Sure. And we're stuck
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Boris Zbarsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
Given that, I suggest moving forward:
Test, then document those methods as having special behavior. Do
this not by a null-value mapping, but by documenting the method's
algorithm in simple terms
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Boris Zbarsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
So is everything else. This particular desire has great benefits, however,
so it needs to have great drawbacks as well to not be done, right?
The drawback would be inconsistency with current
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
