uch on the process and "the right group" too much. Get documents
published, get implementations and polyfills done, then ping all of the
groups listed above to get their feedback. The Credentials CG would be
happy to provide input on the API as it relates to our use cases.
-- manu
--
Ma
p://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdfa-core-20111215/
XHTML+RDFa 1.1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20111215/
Happy Holidays! :)
-- manu
--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Need for Data-Driven Standards
http://manu.sporny.org/2011/d
lecon? I can be present on the call to ensure that the group
understands the reason that we're asking for a review from this WG as
well as answer any questions that the group may have on the RDFa WG's
timeline.
-- manu
--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/
ven't gone
> through the motions, but I think that this gives you a lot of power
> in mapping JSON to something RDFy.
I had looked at JSON Schema before, but not in this context. I looked at
it again and nothing popped to mind. I'll study it a bit more deeply the
next time I
Just in case there are people in this community that haven't seen this yet:
> On May 29th 2010, Manu Sporny tweeted:
> Just published JSON-LD:
>http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/specs/source/json-ld/
> Universal markup of #rdfa #microdata and #microformats via
> lightweigh
; ?
Short answer - your solution is better (as long as developers aren't
required to type all of that out). We've come up with one that's better
still:
// This is really all you need
rdfa.setMapping("foo", "http://foo.com/ns#";);
Then doing something like this:
rdfa.foo.bar
would automagically result in this:
IRI("http://foo.com/ns#bar";)
The getter for the "foo" IRI Mapping object would automatically append
any value attempted for retrieval by the getter to the end of the base
IRI and return that. So in this case, the base IRI is
"http://foo.com/ns#"; and the getter asked for the "bar" property, thus
the final IRI is: "http://foo.com/ns#bar";
-- manu
--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Bitmunk 3.2.2 - Good Relations and Ditching Apache+PHP
http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/05/06/bitmunk-3-2-2/2/
and element
objects rather than in an "rdfa" object? Something like
element.filterData();
* Is the IRI mapping mechanism a design pattern that developers are
comfortable with using?
* Should we use more markup/example combinations, or are the current
markup-less examples helpful?
-- m
