Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Mike Wilson
mike...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks. So I understand it is the HTML specification reference
that provides details on this behaviour for the XHR spec.
I'll look further there as its fetching section by itself
doesn't
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Mike Wilson
mike...@hotmail.com wrote:
I didn't find statements directly addressing this in
http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/
or
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/fe
tching-resourc
es.html
popular browsers, in that it triggers event handlers for
other asynchronous XHR requests while blocking for a
synchronous XHR request.
Thanks
Mike Wilson
.
See chapter 10 and f ex 13.2.1 of:
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-262.pdf
It might be better off to play on hardware terms like CPU,
Execution Unit, etc?
Best regards
Mike Wilson
Ennals, Robert wrote:
The natural place to put this attribute seems
There is also some crypto as part of Dojo:
http://www.dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/dojox/encoding/crypto.html
Best regards
Mike Wilson
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robin Berjon
Sent: den 9 juni 2010
in bringing up any more server-
centric discussions. I do think there is a need though, to
cater for the classical server-side applications' state
management. But I am not sure what WG wants to do this.
Best regards
Mike Wilson
[1]
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-June
in a
single-threaded event-looped environment you may want to look at Node.js
http://nodejs.org/ http://nodejs.org/.
Best regards
Mike Wilson
Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
Posting for those not in HTML WG but interested in this topic.
Thanks,
Nikunj
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: public
behavioural/delegation implementations, and judge the merits
of various optimizations. There has f ex already been mention
of caching parsed selectors.
Best regards
Mike
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Mike Wilson wrote:
My first priority would be Matches Selector, and see to that
it fulfills the needs for event
My first priority would be Matches Selector, and see to that
it fulfills the needs for event delegation.
Best regards
Mike Wilson
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to look at beginning work on Selectors API v2 soon to
add a number of requested features that didn't make
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:54:36 +0200, Mike Wilson
mike...@hotmail.com wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application
No, they actually don't. The article is mainly about server-side
web applications with a few mentions about
the user's
browser).
Best regards
Mike Wilson
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Mark,
You said Web application has been traditionally used to refer
to server-side applications. Is there any reference for this?
It seems more logical to call those Web services to me. Also,
the name of this group
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:54:22 +0200, Mike Wilson
mike...@hotmail.com wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
You said Web application has been traditionally used to refer
to server-side applications. Is there any reference for this?
It seems more logical to call
for www.dangerous.com to include f ex an
img src=http://www.mybank.com/pay?to=hacker;
and the victim's browser will happily send the request together
with the secret cookie at page load time.
If POST is required then it can be done by script and a hidden
iframe, also at page load time.
Best regards
Mike
.html#a16691378
Was any consensus ever reached and what's the status of this
suggestion now?
Personally I think this feature is a very natural part of the
DOM API and believe there needs to be very good reasons not to
include it.
Best regards
Mike Wilson
) and
the unload event to know when the user has decided to
really leave the page.
Making the unload event cancellable would be like making
the load event cancellable - wouldn't make sense.
Best regards
Mike Wilson
Shropshire, Andrew A wrote:
We need to standardize the standardization process... Never heard of
WHATWG. I note that Microsoft isn't a participant. What
page is it on?
WHATWG is the origin of the HTML5 spec. Is it now a joint effort with W3C.
You find the same spec at:
even if a custom dialog in an evil page removes the
Continue option.
Best regards
Mike Wilson
17 matches
Mail list logo
