[Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.

2010-09-30 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9989 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.

2010-09-28 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9989 Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.

2010-09-24 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9989 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.

2010-07-22 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9989 Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 9989] Is the number of replacement characters supposed to be well-defined? If not this should be explicitly noted. If it is then more detail is required.

2010-07-21 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9989 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED