In another thread (in the last couple days) we actually decided to remove
timeouts from normal transactions since they can be implemented as a
setTimeout+abort.
But I agree that we need a way to abort setVersion transactions before
getting the callback (so that we implement timeouts for them as
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:35 AM
In another thread (in the last couple days) we actually decided to remove
timeouts from normal transactions since they can be implemented as a
setTimeout+abort.
But I agree
Regular transactions take a timeout parameter when started, which ensures that
we eventually make progress one way or the other if there's an un-cooperating
script that won't let go of an object store or something like that.
I'm not sure if we discussed this before, it seems that we need to add