Re: [IndexedDB] WebIDL-related spec nits

2012-06-11 Thread Joshua Bell
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote: (Note, I did not include the various things relating to keyPath that I mentioned last week, because I do not consider those to be trivial changes). Globally, the spec is inconsistent about whether the prose is in the same

Re: [IndexedDB] WebIDL-related spec nits

2012-06-11 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@chromium.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote: IDBRequest.readyState should be an enum type, not a DOMString. This was an intentional change, see discussion starting at:

Re: [IndexedDB] WebIDL-related spec nits

2012-06-11 Thread Joshua Bell
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nlwrote: On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Joshua Bell jsb...@chromium.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote: IDBRequest.readyState should be an enum type, not a DOMString. This was

[IndexedDB] WebIDL-related spec nits

2012-06-10 Thread Kyle Huey
(Note, I did not include the various things relating to keyPath that I mentioned last week, because I do not consider those to be trivial changes). Globally, the spec is inconsistent about whether the prose is in the same order as the IDL, or whether the prose is in alphabetical order. I would