On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
It is not worse either way. Equally bad both ways. But, we're
designing a
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org
wrote:
It is
On 08/22/2012 10:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org
mailto:o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org
mailto:rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Maynard
On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 08/22/2012 10:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org
mailto:o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
BTW, I don't think the API should impose any requirements on how browsers
handle undo for their built-in form controls. I have not read the spec
close enough to know if that is the case.
No, the spec. currently doesn't
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 08/22/2012 10:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org mailto:
o...@chromium.org wrote:
On 08/22/2012 11:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 08/22/2012 10:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org
mailto:o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at
(And this time to the mailing list too. Sorry for spamming)
On 08/22/2012 11:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 08/22/2012 10:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org
On 08/22/2012 11:28 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
mailto:m...@apple.com wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
mailto:olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 08/22/2012 10:44 PM, Maciej
Ryosuke Niwa
Software Engineer
Google Inc.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 08/22/2012 11:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
But, again, letting webpages force that behavior in Safari seems wrong to
me. I don't think we should allow violating
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
On 08/22/2012 11:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
But, again, letting webpages force that behavior in Safari seems wrong
to me. I don't think
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
It is not worse either way. Equally bad both ways. But, we're designing a
new API here, so we should make the API as good as possible from the start.
And I think that means allowing multiple undo stack must be in. The
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
It is not worse either way. Equally bad both ways. But, we're designing a
new API here, so we should make the API as good as possible from the start.
And
Hi folks,
I wanted to mention that, in addition to the extra implementation complexity, I
am not sure that multiple independent UndoManagers per page is even a good
feature.
The use cases document gives a use case of a text editor with an embedded
vector graphics editor. But for all the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Ryosuke also raised the possibility of multiple text fields having
separate UndoManagers. On Mac, most apps wipe they undo queue when you
change text field focus. WebKit preserves a single undo queue across text
fields,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Ryosuke also raised the possibility of multiple text fields having
separate UndoManagers. On Mac, most apps wipe they undo queue when you
change text
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Ryosuke also raised the possibility of multiple text fields having
separate
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Ryosuke also raised the possibility of multiple text fields having
separate
On Aug 22, 2012 7:40 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
Ryosuke also
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
Ryosuke also
Will this still allow a node which has an undo manager to be moved
from one part of the document to another part of the document, without
losing all transactions attached to the undo manager?
That seems like an important use case.
/ Jonas
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Ryosuke Niwa
No. Allowing the host to be moved without removing automatic transaction is
what causes the problem because automatic transactions need to keep
relevant nodes alive.
Essentially, this has the same problem has the magic iframe. We can
alternatively change the way automatic transactions work so
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
No. Allowing the host to be moved without removing automatic transaction is
what causes the problem because automatic transactions need to keep relevant
nodes alive.
Essentially, this has the same problem has the magic
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
No. Allowing the host to be moved without removing automatic transaction
is
what causes the problem because automatic transactions need to keep
[Re-sending from the proper address.]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
No. Allowing the host to be moved without removing automatic transaction is
what causes the problem because
Maciej, Ojan, and I had a further conversion about this matter off the
list, and we've concluded that we should drop the support for undoscope
content attribute altogether. So we're just going to do that and let
authors use iframe to have multiple undo managers.
I can keep it around in the spec
Greetings all,
We've been implementing undo manager in WebKit, and we've found out that
allowing live undo manager on a detached undo scope host is a terrible idea.
e.g. say you have a subtree like follows:
- A
- B
- D
- C
where A is the undo scope host. If we then
27 matches
Mail list logo
