If you would prefer that the IETF wg charter refer to something else,
please let me know promptly. A small correction is still possible, but the
window is closing.
On Sep 26, 2014 1:47 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/24/14 1:21 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk wrote:
The linked
On 9/26/14 10:42 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
If you would prefer that the IETF wg charter refer to something else,
please let me know promptly. A small correction is still possible, but
the window is closing.
Well, it seems like IETF process would suggest/prescribe what should be
done. (I
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Martin Thomson martin.thom...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you would prefer that the IETF wg charter refer to something else,
please let me know promptly. A small correction is still possible, but the
window is closing.
I think the IETF spec should continue to refer
CARRERA
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: Re: [Webpush] IETF proposes new Web-Based Push Notifications Working
Group
On 9/24/14 1:21 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk wrote:
The linked working draft is now more than a year old. The latest
editor's draft has some inconsistencies while we transition
[ Bcc webp...@ietf.org ]
Hi All,
I recall the IETF's intent to create a web-based push notifications
protocol standard was previously announced on this list. Please note the
draft charter for this WG explicitly mentions WebApps:
[[
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-webpush/
...
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
wrote:
[ Bcc webp...@ietf.org ]
Hi All,
I recall the IETF's intent to create a web-based push notifications
protocol standard was previously announced on this list. Please note the
draft charter for this WG explicitly
