On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:03:30 +0200, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 4/10/12 7:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
If I'm the only one who prefer the other behavior then we should stick
to what the spec already says. I'll make sure Gecko maintains that
behavior as we implement our new WebIDL
On 4/11/12 3:01 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
How about
send(optional (ArrayBuffer or Blob or Document or DOMString or
FormData)? data = null)
I think that should be fine too, yes. I don't have a strong preference
for that over the overload version or vice versa.
-Boris
Hi All,
Our understanding of the current spec is that if someone calls the
send function and pass as the body to be sent, this is almost
equivalent to not passing a body at all. However, it still changes
which Content-Type header is set. Consider the following code:
xhr = new XMLHttpRequest;
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:08:47 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Is this intentional?
This does match what Gecko does, but we are willing to change this if
others agree that it's a better behavior.
Yes, the idea is that you can transmit both the empty entity body and no
entity
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:08:47 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
Is this intentional?
This does match what Gecko does, but we are willing to change this if
others agree that it's a better behavior.
Yes,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:08:47 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
Is this intentional?
This does match what Gecko does, but we are willing
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:08:47 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
Is
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Is it more surprising than that
xhr.send(hasSomethingToSend() ? getTheThingToSend() : );
sets the Content-Type header even when no body is submitted?
That's exactly what I would expect. A body that happens to have a
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Is it more surprising than that
xhr.send(hasSomethingToSend() ? getTheThingToSend() : );
sets the Content-Type header even when no body is submitted?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Is it more surprising than that
xhr.send(hasSomethingToSend() ?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Is it
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On
12 matches
Mail list logo
