On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:33:38 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
So if I understand the proposal correctly:
After .open has been called with async=false:
* setting .responseType to anything other than throws
InvalidAccessError
* setting .wirthCredentials to true throws
I sometimes like to write code in the window context (where debugging
support is much better) before moving it to a web worker, so it would
be awkward if the sync options differed on xhr between the two.
(Analogous to this - I remember once i was trying to use the new
FileSystemSync API and during
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Matt Shulman mat...@google.com wrote:
I sometimes like to write code in the window context (where debugging
support is much better) before moving it to a web worker, so it would
be awkward if the sync options differed on xhr between the two.
(Analogous to
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Matt Shulman mat...@google.com wrote:
I sometimes like to write code in the window context (where debugging
support is much better) before moving it to a web worker, so it would
be awkward
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:55:25 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Yes, I think cross-origin should not work with sync. That is currently
the only synchronous communication mechanism cross origin. Without it a
UA
could put up UI if it wants to explicitly allow users to control such
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:55:25 +0100, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Yes, I think cross-origin should not work with sync. That is currently the
only synchronous communication mechanism cross origin. Without it a UA
On 11/15/2011 09:33 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Anne van Kesterenann...@opera.com wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:55:25 +0100, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Yes, I think cross-origin should not work with sync. That is currently the
only synchronous
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 11/15/2011 09:33 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Anne van Kesterenann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:55:25 +0100, Jonas Sickingjo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
Yes, I think
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:03:53 +0100, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi
wrote:
I think we should strongly encourage web devs to move away from
sync XHR (in Window context, not in Workers). It is bad for UI
responsiveness.
Unfortunately sync XHR has been used quite often with the old
text/xml
Hi all,
I think we should strongly encourage web devs to move away from
sync XHR (in Window context, not in Workers). It is bad for UI
responsiveness.
Unfortunately sync XHR has been used quite often with the old
text/xml types. But maybe we could disable sync XHR for the new
types, and also
10 matches
Mail list logo